Enzymatic versus chemical deinking of non-impact ink printed paper

Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 79-89

  Pala, H ^a   Mota, M ^a   Gama, F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Deinking; Enzymes; Image analysis; Non impact inks; Paper pulps

Indexed keywords

DEINKING; ENZYMES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PAPER; PARTICLE SEPARATORS; PHOTOCOPYING;

INK PARTICLE SEPARATION;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CELLULASE; ENZYME; GLUCAN SYNTHASE; INK; XYLAN ENDO 1,3 BETA XYLOSIDASE;

ARTICLE; DEINKING; FIBER; FLOTATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONITORING; PAPER; PARTICLE SIZE; PRINTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STANDARD;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRINTS; REPROGRAPHY;

EID: 1642451802     PISSN: 01681656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Azevedo M.A.D., Drelich J., Miller J.D. The effect of pH on pulping and flotation of mixed office wastepaper. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 25(9):1999;317-320.
2. Bailey M.J., Biely P., Poutanen K. Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J. Biotechnol. 23:1992;257-270.
3. Bajpai P., Bajpai P.K. Deinking with enzymes: a review. Tappi J. 81(12):1998;111-117.
4. Berlin G.A., Tikhomirov D.F., Sinitsyn A.P. Evaluation of enzymatic deinking of toners from MOW. Abstracts of papers of the ACS-Division of Cellulose. Paper Textile. 213:1997;63.
5. Bernfeld P. Amylases, α and β Methods Enzymol. 1(17):1955;149-152.
6. Bhat G.R., Heitmann J.A., Joyce T.W. Novel techniques for enhancing the strength of secondary fibre. Tappi J. 74(9):1991;151-157.
7. Deng Y. Effect of fiber surface chemistry on the fiber loss in flotation deinking. Tappi J. 83(6):2000;61.
8. Drabek O., Sterne J., Van de Ven T.G.M. Effect of deinking chemicals on the deposition of fines and fillers on an air-water interface. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 24(4):1998;116-120.
9. Duff S.J.B., Moritz J.W., Casavant T.E. Effect of surfactant and particle size reduction on hydrolysis of deinking sludge and nonrecyclable newsprint. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 45:1995;239-244.
10. Franks, N.E., Munk, N., 1995. Alkaline cellulases and the enzymatic deinking of mixed office waste. In: Proceedings of TAPPI Pulping Conference, pp. 343-347.
11. Gübitz, G.M., Mansfield, S.D., Saddler, J.N., 1998. Effectiveness of two endoglucanases from gloeophyllum sp. in deinking mixed office waste paper. In: The 7th International Conference on Biotechnology and Pulp Paper Industry C, pp. C135-C138.
12. Harrison, A., 1991. Flotation deinking is critical in unit process method of deinking. Paper recycling - strategies, economics, and technology. In: Patrick, K.L. (Ed.), Pulp & Paper Focus Book, vol. 35. Miller Freeman, San Francisco, Cap., pp. 144-149.
13. Heise, O.U., Fineran Jr., W.G., Unwin, J.P., Sykes, M., Klungness, J.H., Abubakr, S., 1995. Industrial scale-up of enzyme deinking of non-impact printed toners. In: Proceedings of TAPPI Pulping Conference, pp. 349-354.
14. Jackson L.S., Heitmann J.A., Joyce T.W. Enzymatic modifications of secondary fibre. Tappi J. 76(3):1993;147-154.
15. Jeffries T.W., Klungness J.H., Sykes M.S., Rutledge-Cropsey K. Comparison of enzyme-enhanced with conventional deinking of xerographic and laser-printed paper. Tappi J. 77(4):1994;173-179.
16. Jeffries, T.W., Sykes, M.S., Rutledge-Cropsey, K., Klungness, J.H., Abubakr, S., 1995. Enhanced removal of toners from office waste papers by microbial cellulases. In: The 6th International Conference on Biotechnology and Pulp Paper Industry, pp. 141-144.
17. Jobbins J.M., Franks N.E. Enzymatic deinking of mixed office waste: process condition optimization. Tappi J. 80(9):1997;73-78.
18. Kim M.H., Lee S.B., Ryu D.Y. Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 4:1982;99-103.
19. Kim, T.-J., Ow, S.S.-K., Eom, T.-J., 1991. Enzymatic deinking method of wastepaper. In: Proceedings of TAPPI Pulping Conference, pp. 1023-1031.
20. Knudsen, O., Young, J.D., Yang, J.L., 1998. Long-term use of enzymatic deinking at Stora Dalum plant. In: The 7th International Conference on Biotechnology and Pulp Paper Industry A, pp. A17-A20.
21. Marques S., Pala H., Alves L., Amaral-Collaço M.T., Gama F.M., Gírio F.M. Characterisation and application of glycanases secreted by Aspergillus terreus CCMI 498 and Trichoderma viride CCMI 84 for enzymatic deinking of mixed office wastepaper. J. Biotech. 100:2003;209-219.
22. Marton R., Brown A., Granzow S., Koeppicus R., Tomlinson S. Recycling and fibre structure. Prog. Paper Recycl. 3(2):1993;58-70.
23. Ow, S.K., Park, J.-M., Han, S.-H., 1995. Effects of enzyme on ink size and distribution during enzymatic deinking process of old newsprint. In: The 6th International Conference on Biotechnology and Pulp Paper Industry, pp. 163-168.
24. Pala H., Lemos M.A., Mota M., Gama F.M. Enzymatic upgrade of old paperboard containers. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 29:2001;274-279.
25. Park J.W., Takahata Y., Kajiuchi T., Akehata T. Effects of nonionic surfactant on enzymatic hydrolysis of used newspaper. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 39:1992;117-120.
26. Prasad D.Y., Heitmann J.A., Joyce T.W. Enzyme deinking of black and white letterpress printed newspaper waste. Prog. Paper Recycl. 1(3):1992;21-30.
27. Prasad D.Y. Enzymatic deinking of laser and xerographic office wastes. Appita. 46(4):1993;289-292.
28. Quick T.H., Hodgson K.T. Xerography deinking - a fundamental approach. Tappi J. 69(3):1986;102-106.
29. Rao R.N., Stenius P. Mechanisms of ink release from model surfaces and fibre. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 24(6):1998;183-187.
30. Rutledge-Cropsey, K., Jeffries, T.W., Klungness, J.H., Sykes, M.S., 1994. Preliminary results of effect of sizings on enzyme-enhanced deinking. In: TAPPI Recycling Symposium Notes, pp. 103-105.
31. Shrinath A., Szewczak J.T., Bowen I.J. A review of ink-removal techniques in current deinking technology. Tappi J. 74(7):1991;85-93.
32. Stork G., Pereira H., Wood T.M., Düsterhöft E.M., Toft A., Puls J. Upgrading recycled pulps using enzymatic treatment. Tappi J. 78(2):1995;79-88.
33. Treimanis A., Leite M., Eisimonte M., Viesturs U. Enzymatic deinking of laser-printed white office wastepaper. Chem. Biochem. Eng. 13(2):1999;53-57.
34. Vicente A.A., Teixeira J.A. Hydrodynamic performance of a three-phase airlift bioreactor with an enlarged degassing zone. Bioprocess Eng. 14:1995;17-22.
35. Wielen L.C.V., Panek J.C., Pfromm P.H. Fracture of toner due to paper swelling. Tappi J. 82(5):1999;115-121.
36. Wood T.M., Bhat K.M. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enzymol. 160(9):1988;87-112.
37. Zeyer C., Joyce T.W., Heitmann J.A., Rucker J.W. Factors influencing enzyme deinking of recycled fiber. Tappi J. 77(10):1994;169-177.
38. Zeyer C., Venditti R.A., Puangchinda K.W., Heitmann J.A. The distribution of impurities in pulp and paper: the effects of the random distribution of impurities on image analysis. Tappi J. 78(2):1995a;168-175.
39. Zeyer C., Venditti R.A., Heitmann J.A. The effect of sample size on the confidence interval for image analysis of impurities in pulp and paper. Tappi J. 78(2):1995b;176-179.