How can a work rehabilitation process be improved? - A qualitative study from the prespective of social insurance officers

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 299-305

  Gard, Gunvor ^a   Söderberg, Siv ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EMPLOYER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SOCIAL INSURANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SWEDEN; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; SOCIAL SECURITY; SWEDEN;

EID: 1642444929     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280310001647624     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Prop 1990/91:140. Regeringens proposition om arbetsmiljö och rehabilitering. (In Swedish) (Work environment and rehabilitation). Stockholm, 1991.
2. SoS-rapport 1993:10. Rehabilitering inom hälso- och sjukvården, för alla åldrar och diagnoser (Rehabilitation in health and care, regarding all ages and diagnoses) Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm, 1993.
3. Keith RA. Conceptual bases of outcome measures. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995; 74(1): 73-80.
4. Fugl-Meyer AR, Brännholm IB, Fugl-Meyer K. Om tillfredsställelse, lycka och rehabilitering. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift 1992, 1: 33-41.
5. Lindkvist R. Work, sickness and rehabilitation. In: S Marklund (ed) Rehabilitation in a Political Perspective. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1992; 15-32.
6. Gard G. Balansen mellan arbetets krav och individens kapaciteten bas för bedömning av arbetsförmåga. Arbete, Människa, Miljö & Nordisk Ergonomi 1998; 1: 29-35.
7. WHO International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to consequences of disease, Geneva, 1980.
8. SOU 1988:41. Tidig och samordnad rehabilitering (Early and coordinated rehabilitation). Stockholm, 1988.
9. Jeppsson-Grassman E. The demands of work and individual suffering. Report 57 in social sciences, Stockholm University, 1992.
10. Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1995; 62: 250-257.
11. Jakobsson B, Schuldt Håård U, Bergroth A, Selander J, Ekholm J. Improved cooperation in vocational rehabilitation with systematic rehabilitation group meetings. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 734-740.
12. Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sicklisted:aN action theory perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 719-726.
13. Larsson G, Setterlind S. About coping in life. FOU report 41, Malmö. Team Offset, 1994.
14. Selander MA, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. The process of vocational rehabilitation for employed and unemployed people on sick-leave. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1998; 30: 55-60.
15. Edlund C, Dahlgren L. The physician's role in the vocational rehabilitation process. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 727-733.
16. Engström L-G, Eriksen T. Can differences in benefit levels explain duration and outcome of sickness absence? Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 713-718.
17. Selander J, Marnetoft S U, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems:rIsk factors reviewed. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(14): 704-712.
18. Kvale S. Den Kvalitativa Forskningsintervjun (InterViews). Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1997; 25-39.
19. Sandelowski M. Telling stories: Narrative approaches in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1991; 23:161-166.
20. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1990; 381-383.
21. Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today 1991; 11: 461-466.
22. Downe-Wamboldt B. (1992) Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International 1992; 13: 313-321.
23. Söderberg S, Lundman B. Transition experienced by women with fibromyalgia. Health Care for Women International 2001; 22: 617-631.
24. Woods NF, Catanzaro M. (1988) Nursing Research. Theory and Practice. C.V. Washington, DC: Mosby Company, 1988.
25. Winberg, S. Working environment and rehabilitation with the workplace as a basis. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 1997; 5: 8-9.
26. Schuldt Håård U, Jakobsson B, Kärrholm J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Clients views about rehabilitation in cooperation between occuaptional health care, community care and the social insurance company. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 2001; 6: 517-531.
27. Rivano-Fisher M, Tuvfesson B. Characteristics and evaluation of rehabilitation processes. Lund-Orup rehabilitation centre, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1997: 18-52.
28. Gard G. Work motivating factors in rehabilitation: A brief review. Physical Therapy Reviews 2001; 6: 85-89.
29. Grahn B. Quality of life, motivation and costs in multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University, Sweden, 1999.
30. Gard G, Gille K.Å. Functional activities and psychosocial factors in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2000; 14: 75-81.
31. Mannerkorpi K. Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University, Sweden, 1999.
32. Gard G, Sandberg AC. Motivating factors for return to work. Physiotherapy Research International 1998; 3: 100-108.
33. Shaw L, Segal R, Polatajko H, Harburn K. Understanding return to work behaviours: Promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 185-195.
34. Dannemark B, Kullberg, B. Cooperation - a new type of work in the Welfare state. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, 1999.
35. Jakobsson B, Schuldt Håård U, Bergroth A, Selander J, Ekholm J. Improved cooperation between organisations in work rehabilitation. Swedish Journal of Social Medicine 2001; 6: 506-516.
36. Grape O. Between the Stick and the Carrot. A case study of the rehabilitation reform in 1992. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden, 2002.
37. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 24(18): 970-974.