Invasive weed species in onion production systems during the last 25 years in Amasya, Turkey

Pakistan Journal of Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 155-160

  Mennan, Hüsrev ^a   Işik, Doǧan ^a,b  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BLACK SEA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLIUM CEPA; AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; AVES; BIFORA; BIFORA RADIANS; CHENOPODIUM; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; CIRSIUM; CIRSIUM ARVENSE; CONVOLVULUS; CONVOLVULUS ARVENSIS; HELIOTROPIUM; HELIOTROPIUM EUROPAEUM; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; SINAPIS; SINAPIS ARVENSIS; SOLANUM; SOLANUM NIGRUM; XANTHIUM; XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM;

EID: 1642441554     PISSN: 05563321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. th EWRS Symposium, Budapest 1995. 1: pp. 41-48.
2. Andersson, N.T. and P. Milberg. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation and nitrogen. Weed Science, 46: 30-38
3. Chancellor, R.J. 1985. Changes in the weed flora of arable field cultivated for 20 years. J. Applied Ecology, 22, 491.
4. Chancellor, R.J. and R.J. Froud-Willams. 1986. Weed problems of the next decade in Britain. Crop Protection, 5(1): 66-72.
5. Davis, P.H. 1965-1984. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol.I-X, University Press, Edinburgh.
6. Dunan, C.M., P. Westra, F. Moore and P. Chapman, 1996. Modelling the effect of duration of weed competition, weed density and weed competitiveness on seeded, irrigated onion. Weed Research, 36: 259-269.
7. Ellenberg, H. 1979. Indicator values of vascular plants in Central Europe. Verlag Erich Goltze KG, Göttingen p 122.
8. Froud-Willams, R.J. 1987. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. In: Weed management in agro ecosystems: ecological approaches, (Eds.): M. Altieri and M Liebman. CRC Press, Inc. Florida pp 213-236.
9. Gönen, O. and F.N. Uygur. 1998. Changes of weed flora in cotton growing areas during the last 13 years. Proc. 6th Mediterranean Symposium EWRS, Montpellier, 225-226.
10. Jauzein, P.H. 1998. Bilan des espèces naturalisées en France Méditerranéenne. Proc. 6th Mediterranean Symposium EWRS, Montpellier, 18-25.
11. Korkut, İ. and M. Kasa. 1979. Karadeniz Bölgesinde Soǧanlarda Zararli Olan Yabanci Otlar ve Bunlarla Savaşim Olanaklari Üzerinde Ön Çaliçmalar. Samsun Bölge Zirai Mücadele Araştirma Enstitüsü, 108 627E nolu proje Nihai Raporu, Samsun.
12. Maillet, J. and C. Lopez-Garcia. 2000. What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural weed? The case of invasive American species in France. Weed Research, 40(1) 11-26.
13. Marshall, E.J.P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. Journal of Applied Ecology, 26: 24-257.
14. Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, p. 574.
15. Parker, C. 1977. Prediction of new weed problems especially in the developing world. Proc. 18 th Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc., Blackwell Scientific, Bangor Wales, 249.
16. Powell, K. and A.R. Jutsum, 1993. Technical and commercial aspects of bio control products. Pesticide Science, 37: 315-321.
17. Prado, A., M.L. Suso, C. Zaragoza, Rcalvo and S. Perez. 1990. Competition between weeds and direct seeded onion (Allium cepa) 23. Hort. Congress. Abst.
18. Streibig, J.C. and C. Andreassen. 1993. Crop management affects the community dynamics of weeds. BCPC, Weeds, 487-493.