Temporal changes in the abundance of barbel, Barbus barbus in the Jihlava River, Czech Republic

Folia Zoologica

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 441-448

  Peňáz, Milan ^a   Pivnička, Karel ^b   Baruš, Vlastimil ^a   Prokeš, Miroslav ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b Charles University   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Capture recapture; Electrofishing; Survival; Tagging

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; FISH; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; SURVIVAL; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE; JIHLAVA RIVER;

BARBUS; BARBUS BARBUS;

EID: 1642423645     PISSN: 01397893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. CHAPMAN W.E. 1951: Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological censuses. Univ. of California Publ. Stat. 1: 131-160.
2. HUNT P.C. & JONES J.W. 1974: A population study of Barbus barbus (L.) in the River Severn, England. I. Densities. J. Fish Biol. 6: 255-267.
3. KREBS Ch. J. 1999: Ecological Methodology. 2nd Edition. Harper and Row Publ.
4. LELEK A. 1987: The Freshwater Fishes of Europe, Vol. 9, Threatened Fishes of Europe. AULA Verlag Wiesbaden, 343 pp.
5. LUSK S. 1996a: Development and status of populations of Barbus barbus in the waters of the Czech Republic. Folia Zool. 45 (Suppl. 1): 39-46.
6. LUSK S. 1996b: The status of the fish fauna in the Czech Republic. In Kirchhofer A. & Hefti D. (eds), Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fish in Europe. Birkhäuser Verlag, 341 pp.
7. LUSK S. & HANEL L. 2000: Červený seznam mihulí a ryb České republiky - verze 2000 (The Red List of lampreys and fishes in the Czech Republic - Version 2000). Biodiversity of Fishes in the Czech Republic III, ILE ASCR Brno: 5-13 (in Czech with English summary).
8. MANN R.H.K. 1980: The numbers and production of pike (Esox lucius) in two Dorset rivers. J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 899-915.
9. PEŇÁZ M., BARUŠ V. & PROKEŠ M. 1999: Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in a river used for energy production. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 15: 169-180.
10. PEŇÁZ M., BARUŠ V. & PROKEŠ M., HOMOLKA M. 2002a: Movements of barbel, Barbus barbus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Folia Zool. 51(1): 55-66.
11. PEŇÁZ M., BARUŠ V., PROKEŠ M. & SVOBODOVÁ Z. 2002b: Změny některých atributů populace parmy obecné v řece Jihlavě během posledních 25 let a jejich přičiny (Changes of some attributes of the barbel, Barbus barbus population from the Jihlava River during past 25 years and their causes). Proc. of the Czech Ichthyol. Conf., MZLU Brno: 5-10 (in Czech with English summary).
12. PEŇÁZ M., SVOBODOVÁ Z., BARUŠ V., PROKEŠ M., HAJŠLOVÁ J. & DRASTICHOVÁ J.: Evidence for endocrine disruption and sex reversal in a barbel, Barbus barbus (Pisces: Teleostei) population. J. Fish Biol. (in press).
13. PEŇÁZ M. & WOHLGEMUTH E. 1990: Ichthyocoenosis of a section of the Jihlava River influenced by the Dukovany-Daleǎice power system. Folia Zool. 39 (2): 157-169.
14. PHILIPPART J.C. 1987: Population ecology, conservation and restoration of the barbel, Barbus barbus (Linné) (Teleostei, Cyprinidas) in the Meuse River and its tributaries - 15 years of research. Annales de la Societe Royale Zoologique de Belgique 117: (1) 49-61.
15. RICKER W.E. 1975: Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. of the Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 191: 380 pp.
16. SEBER G.A.F. 1982: Estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. 2nd edition. London, 654 pp.
17. SEBER G. & LeCREN E. 1967: Estimating population parameters from catches large relative to the population. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 631-643.
18. ZIPPIN C. 1958: The removal method of population estimation. J. Wildlife Manage. 22: 82-90.