'Economic injury level' and preventive pest control

Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 170-172

  Stejskal, Václav ^a  

^a CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; PEST DAMAGE; THRESHOLD;

EID: 1642422404     PISSN: 14365693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-003-0015-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BINNS, M.R.; NYROP, J.P.; VAN DER WERF, W. (2000): Sampling and Monitoring in Crop protection. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 284 pp.
2. HANSKI, I. (1999): Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. 313 pp.
3. HEONG, K.L.; ESCALADA, M.M. (1999): Quantifying rice farmers' pest management decisions: beliefs and subjective norms in stem borer control. Crop Protection 18, 315-322.
4. HORN, D.J. (1988): Ecological approach to pest management. Elsevier Appl. Science Publ., Barking. 273 pp.
5. MUMFORD, J.D. (1982): Farmers' perceptions and crop protection decision-making. 13-19. In: AUSTIN (ed.), Decision making in the Practice of Crop Protection. Monograph No. 25. BCPC Publications, Croydon. 235 pp.
6. MUMFORD, J.D.; KNIGHT, J.D. (1997): Injury, damage and threshold concepts. In: DENT, D. (ed.), Methods in ecological and agricultural entomology. CAB, Oxon, 203-220 pp.
7. NUTTER, F.W.; TENG, P.S.; ROYER, M.H. (1993): Terms and concepts for yield, crop loss and disease threshold. Plant Disease 77, 211-215.
8. PEDIGO, L.P. (1991): Entomology and pest management. Macmillan Publ. Comp., New York. 356 pp.
9. PEDIGO, L.P.; HUTCHINSON, S.H.; HIGHLEY L.G. (1986): Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Ent. 13, 341-368.
10. RAMIREZ, O.; SAUNDERS, J. (1999): Estimating economic thresholds for pest control: an alternative procedure. J. Econ. Ent. 92, 391-401.
11. SOUTHWOOD, T.; NORTON G. (1973): Economic aspects of pest management strategies and decisions. Ecol. Soc. Aust. Mem. 1, 168-184.
12. STEJSKAL, V. (2001): A new concept of economic injury level that includes penalization of damage to quality and safety of agricultural products. Plant Prot. Sci. 37, 151-156.
13. STEJSKAL, V. (2002): Inversion relationship between action threshold and economic/aesthetic injury level for the control of urban and quarantine pests. J. Pest Sci. 75, 158-16.
14. STEJSKAL., V.; LUKAS, J. (2002): Distinguishing injury from damage and post-harvest projection, 95-98. In: CREDLAND P.; ARMITAGE, D.; BELL, C. and HIGLEY, E. (eds.), Advances in Stored Product Protection. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 1071 pp.
15. STERN, V.; SMITH, R.; VAN DEN BOSCH, R.; HAGEN, K. (1959): The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29, 81-101.
16. SUBRAMANYAM, B.; HAGSTRUM D. (2000): Alternatives to pesticides in stored-product IPM. Kluwer Acad. Press, Boston. 437.
17. TURCHIN, P. (1995): Population regulation: old arguments and a new synthesis. In: CAPUCINO, N. and PRICE, P.W. (eds.), Population dynamics: New approaches and synthesis. Acad. Press, London. pp. 19-40.