Methodological difficulties of nation wide studies on adolescents' doping;Difficultés méthodologiques lors d'enquêtes nationales sur le dopage des adolescents. À propos d'un cas

Science and Sports

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 86-90

  Laure, P ^a,b   Binsinger, C ^a   Le Scanff, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

^b DRDJS   (France)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Dopage; Doping; Epidemiology; pid miologie; Methods; M thodes; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DOPING; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SPORTS MEDICINE;

EID: 1642419852     PISSN: 07651597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2003.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Auge W.K., Auge S.M. Naturalistic observation of athletic drug-use patterns and behavior in professional-caliber bodybuilders. Subst Use Misuse. 34:1999;217-249.
2. Berthier N. Les techniques d'enquête. 1998;6Armand Colin, Paris.
3. Clark T.J., Khan K.S., Gupta J.K. Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 55:2001;595-596.
4. Coombs R.H., Coombs C.J. The impact of drug testing on the morale and well-being of mandatory participants. Intern J Addictions. 26:1991;981-992.
5. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2000;Wiley, New York.
6. Ferenchick G.S. Validity of self-report in identifying anabolic steroid use among weightlifters. J Gen Intern Med. 11:1996;554-556.
7. Heberlein T.A., Baumgartner R. Factors affecting response rates of mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. Am Sociological Rev. 43:1978;446-462.
8. Huang J.Y., Hubbard S.M., Mulvey K.P. Obtaining valid response rates: considerations beyond the tailored design method. Evaluation Program Planning. 26:2003;91-97.
9. Korkia P., Stimson G.V. Indications of prevalence, practice and effects of anabolic steroid use in Great Britain. Int J Sports Med. 18:1997;557-562.
10. Laure P. Dopage et société 2000;Ellipses, Paris. (dir).
11. Laure P., Lecerf T., Friser A., Binsinger C. Drug, Recreational Drug Use and Attitudes Toward Doping of High School Athletes. Int J Sports Medicine. 2003;. (sous presse).
12. Laure P. Éthique du dopage. 2003;Ellipses, Paris.
13. Laure P., Kriebitzsch-Lejeune A. Retails pharmacists and doping in sports: knowledge and attitudes. A national survey in France. Sci Sports. 3:2003;141-146.
14. Nocelli L., Kamber M., Francois Y., Gmel G., Marti B. Discordant public perception of doping in elite vs recreational sport in Switzerland. Clin J Sport Med. 8:1998;195-200.
15. Röggla G., Röggla M., Zeiner A., Röggla H., Deusch E., Wagner A., et al. Amphetamindoping bein Freizeitbergsteigen in mittlerer Hohenlage in den Alpen. Schweiz Z Sportmed. 41:1993;103-105.
16. Spry V.M., Hovell M.F., Sallis J.G., Hofsteter C.R., Elder J.P., Molgaard C.A. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts. Am J Epidemiol. 130:1989;166-172.