Agricultural trade, commodity programs, and income protection in the United States

Journal of Policy Modeling

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 41-46

  Miljkovic, Dragan ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Rodrik's hypothesis; US agricultural policy; Wagner's law

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642419521     PISSN: 01618938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2003.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Baltagi B.H. (1999). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd edition). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2. Cochrane W.W. Runge C.F. (1992). Reforming farm policy: Toward a national agenda (1st edition). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
3. Henrekson M. (1990). An economic analysis of Swedish government expenditure. Vasastadens Bokbinderi AB.
4. Holsey C.M. & Borcherding T.E. (1997). Why does government's share of national income grow? An assessment of the recent literature on the US experience. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice. Cambridge University Press, pp. 562-589.
5. Knutson R.D. Penn J.B. & Flinchbaugh B.L. (1998). Agricultural and food policy (4th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Rodrik D. Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106 1998 997-1032
7. Suits D.B. Dummy variables: mechanics v. interpretation Review of Economics and Statistics 66 1984 177-180