Toward constraining regional-scale fluxes of CO2 with atmospheric observations over a continent: 2. Analysis of COBRA data using a receptor-oriented framework

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Volumn 108, Issue 24, 2003, Pages

  Gerbig, C ^a   Lin, J C ^a   Wofsy, S C ^a   Daube, B C ^a   Andrews, A E ^a   Stephens, B B ^b   Bakwin, P S ^c   Grainger, C A ^d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjoint model; Lagrangian model

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE SENSING; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; LAGRANGIAN ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION; TROPOSPHERE;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 1642416734     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2003jd003770     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andres, R. J., G. Marland, I. Fung, and E. Matthews, A one degree by one degree distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950-1990, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10(3), 419-429, 1996.
2. 2: Implications for stratospheric transport, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D21), 26,581-26,595, 1999.
3. Atkinson, R., D. L. Baulch, R. A. Cox, F. R. J. Hampson, J. A. Kerr, M. J. Rossi, and J. Troe, Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Supplement V, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 26, 521-1011, 1997.
4. Baldocchi, D., et al., FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy flux densities, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82(11), 2415-2434, 2001.
5. Belward, A. S., J. E. Estes, and K. D. Kline, The IGBP-DIS global 1-km land-cover data set DISCover: A project overview, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 65(9), 1013-1020, 1999.
6. Benkovitz, C. M., M. T. Scholtz, J. Pacyna, L. Tarrason, J. Dignon, E. C. Voldner, P. A. Spiro, J. A. Logan, and T. E. Graedel, Global gridded inventories of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur and nitrogen, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D22), 29,239-29,253, 1996.
7. 2 concentrations, Tellus, Ser. B, 48, 543-567, 1996.
8. Ebel, A., R. Friedrich, and H. Rodhe (Eds.), Transport and Chemical Transformation of Pollutants in the Troposphere, vol. 7, Tropospheric Modelling and Emission Estimation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
9. 2 inversions, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D22), 4635, doi:10.1029/2002JD002195, 2002.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Regional Interim Emission Inventories (1987-1991), vols. 1 and 2, Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1993.
11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Inventory of U. S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-1999, Research Triangle Park, N. C., 2001.
12. Errico, R. M., What is an adjoint model?, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78(11), 2577-2591, 1997.
13. 2 with atmospheric observations over a continent: 1. Observed spatial variability from airborne platforms, J. Geophys., 108, doi:10.1029/2002JD003018, in press, 2003.
14. 2: Cooperative Atmospheric Data Integration Project: Carbon Dioxide [CD-ROAM], NOAA Clim. Monit. and Diagnostics Lab., Boulder, Colo., 2002.
15. Holzer, M., and T. M. Hall, Transit-time and tracer-age distributions in geophysical flows, J. Atmos. Sci., 57(21), 3539-3558, 2000.
16. Kaminski, T., P. J. Rayner, M. Heimann, and I. G. Enting, On aggregation errors in atmospheric transport inversions, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D5), 4703-4715, 2001.
17. Kogan, F. N., Global drought watch from space, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78(4), 621-636, 1997.
18. 2 in the central part of Japan, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 79(1), 11-21, 2001.
19. 2 inversions, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10(4), 783-796, 1996.
20. 2 inversions, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16(4), 1053, doi:10.1029/2001GB001593, 2002.
21. 2 in the Northern Hemisphere, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 13(2), 273-286, 1999.
22. Lin, J. C., C. Gerbig, S. C. Wofsy, A. E. Andrews, B. C. Daube, K. J. Davis, and C. A. Grainger, A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D16), 4493, doi:10.1029/2002JD003161, 2003.
23. 2 from fossil fuel burning: Updates on the magnitude, distribution, and uncertainty of emission estimates, in Fifth International Carbon Dioxide Conference, p. 4, CSIRO, Cairns, Queensl., Australia, 1997.
24. Novelli, P. C., K. A. Masarie, and P. M. Lang, Distributions and recent changes of carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D15), 19,015-19,033, 1998.
25. 2 concentrations in New England from observations at a forest flux tower, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D8), 9561-9569, 1999.
26. Rodgers, C. D., Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, 238 pp., World Sci., River Edge, N. J., 2000.
27. Rogers, E., D. G. Deaven, and G. J. Dimego, The regional analysis system for the operational early Eta-model: Original 80-km configuration and recent changes, Weather Forecast., 10(4), 810-825, 1995.
28. Wang, Y. P., Estimating regional terrestrial carbon fluxes for the Australian continent using a multiple-constraint approach: II. The atmospheric constraint, Tellus, Ser., 290-304, 2003.
29. Wofsy, S. C., and R. C. Harriss, The North American Carbon Program NACP), report of the NACP Committee of the U. S. Interagency Carbon Cycle Science Program, U. S. Global Change Res. Program, Washington, D. C., 2002.