Statistical approaches to evaluate agreement;Métodos estadísticos para evaluar la concordancia

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 122, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 28-34

  Carrasco, Josep Lluís ^a   Jover, Lluís ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agreement; Measurement error; Measurement method; Reliability; Switchability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTATION; MEASUREMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1642391656     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13057543     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Nueva York: Wiley, 1986.
2. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurements 1960;20:37-46.
3. Shoukri MM. Measurement of agreement. En: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1998; p. 103-17.
4. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. Nueva York: Wiley & Sons, 1996.
5. Shoukri MM, Martin SW, Mian IUH. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from models of matched binary responses. Stat Med 1995;14:83-99.
6. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provisions for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-20.
7. Thompson WD, Walter SD. A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:969-70.
8. Shoukri MM, Pause CA. Statistical methods for health sciences, 2nd ed. Boca Ratón: CRC Press, 1999.
9. Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10.
11. Kelly GE. Use of the structural equations model in assessing the reliability of a new measurement technique. Applied Statistics 1985;34:258-63.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard methods is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085-7.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8(2):135-60.
14. Andersson SW, Niklasson A, Lapidus L, Hallberg L, Bengtsson C, Hulthén L. Poor agreement between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records in adult women. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:609-16.
15. Schisterman EF, Faraggi D, Reiser B, Trevisan M. Statistical inference for the are under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:174-9.
16. White E. Design and interpretation of studies of differential exposure measurement error. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:380-7.