Crowding under scotopic conditions

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 963-969

  Simunovic, Matthew P ^a,b   Calver, Richard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crowding effect; Scotopic vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; NIGHT VISION; PHOTOPIC VISION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DARK ADAPTATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 1642386994     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderton, P. J. (1974). Contour interaction effects in the design of visual displays. MSc, University of Melbourne
2. Bondarko V.M., Danilova M.V. What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C? Vision Research. 37:1997;2153-2156.
3. Davson H. Physiology of the eye. 1990;MacMillan, London.
4. Ehlers H. The movements of eyes during reading. Archives of Ophthalmology. 14:1936;56-63.
5. Flom M.C., Heath G.G., Takahashi E. Contour interaction and visual resolution: Contralateral effects. Science. 142:1963;979-980.
6. Flom M.C., Weymouth F.W., Kahneman D. Visual resolution and contour interaction. Vision Research. 53:1963;1026-1032.
7. Gilbert C.D. Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron. 9:1992;1-13.
8. Hart, W. M. (1992). The temporal responsiveness of vision. In W. M. Hart (Ed.), Adler's physiology of the eye (pp. 548-578). St. Louis: Mosby Yearbook
9. Hess R.F., Dakin S.C., Kapoor N. The foveal 'crowding' effect: Physics or physiology? Vision Research. 40:2000;365-370.
10. Hess R.F., Dakin S.C., Kapoor N., Tewfik M. Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics Image Science and Vision. 17:2000;1516-1524.
11. Korte W. Uber die Gestaltauffassung im indirekten Sehen. Zeitschrift für Psyhologie. 93:1923;17-82.
12. Kothe A.C., Regan D. Crowding depends on contrast. Optometry and Vision Science. 67:1990;283-286.
13. Lee B.B., Smith V.C., Pokorny J., Kremers J. Rod inputs to macaque ganglion cells. Vision Research. 37:1997;2813-2828.
14. Lennie P., Fairchild M.D. Ganglion-cell pathways for rod vision. Vision Research. 34:1994;477-482.
15. Liu L. Can the amplitude difference spectrum peak frequency explain the foveal crowding effect? Vision Research. 41:2001;3693-3704.
16. Lythgoe J.N., Partridge J.C. The modelling of optimal visual pigments of dichromatic teleosts in green coastal waters. Vision Research. 31:1991;361-371.
17. Peichl L., Wässle H. The structural correlate of the receptive field centre of alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology. 341:1983;309-324.
18. Sharpe L.T., Stockman A., Jaegle H., Nathans J. Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision and color blindness. Gegenfurtner K., Sharpe L.T. Color vision: From genes to perception. 1999;Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Simmers A.J., Gray L.S., McGraw P.V., Winn B. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 19:1999;253-260.
20. Tripathy S.P., Cavanagh P. The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research. 42:2002;2357-2360.
21. Tripathy S.P., Levi D.M. Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual-cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot. Vision Research. 34:1994;1127-1138.
22. Westheimer, G. (1992). Visual acuity. In W. M. Hart (Ed.), Adler's physiology of the eye (pp. 531-547). St. Louis: Mosby Yearbook
23. Woodworth R.S. Experimental psychology. 1938;Holt, New York.