The future of ultrasound: Viewing the dark side of the moon?

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 211-215

  Benacerraf, B ^a  

^a Diagnostic Ultrasound Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ANUS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HEART; HUMAN; LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS FLOOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; STANDARDIZATION; UTERUS; VASCULARIZATION;

FEMALE; FORECASTING; GENITALIA, FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 1642383498     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.993     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Campbell S. 4D, or not 4D: that is the question. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 1-4.
2. Kossoff G. Three-dimensional ultrasound - technology push or market pull. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 217-218.
3. DeVore GR, Falkensammer P, Sklansky MS, Platt LD. Spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 380-387.
4. Michailidis GD, Simpson JM, Karidas C, Economides DL. Detailed three-dimensional fetal echocardiography facilitated by Internet link. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 325-328.
5. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Lev-Toaff A, Bega G, Budorick NE, Hollenbach KA, Needleman L. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using 3-D ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 941-952.
6. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK, Hill EC. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990; 176: 715-720.
7. Merz E. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in gynecological diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 81-83.
8. Niitsu M, Tanaka YO, Anno I, Itai Y. Multishot echoplanar MR imaging of the female pelvis: comparison with fast spin-echo MR imaging in an initial clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 651-655.
9. Kim JK, Kim YJ, Choo MS, Cho K. The urethra and its supporting structures in women with stress urinary incontinence: MR imaging using an endovaginal coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1037-1044.
10. Tan IL, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, Entius KAC, Calame JJ, Lameis JS. The female pelvic floor: endovaginal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 1998; 206: 777-783.
11. Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Hasting R. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: the effect of parturition on paravaginal support structures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 589-595.
12. Greenbaum LD. It is time for the sonoscope. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 321-322.
13. Hoffmann B. The future is not the sonoscope (Letter). J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 997-998.
14. Sirlin CB, Casola G, Brown MA, Patel N, Bendavid EJ, Hoyt DB. Patterns of fluid accumulation on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 351-357.