Actants in semantics and syntax I: Actants in semantics

Linguistics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-66

  Mel'čuk, Igor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642382891     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2004.004     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Abraham, Werner (ed.) (1978). Valence, Semantic Case and Grammatical Relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Allerton, D. (1982). Valency and the English Verb. London: Academic Press.
3. Apresjan, Jurij (1998 [1974]). Leksičeskaja semantika. Moscow: Nauka.
4. _ (2000a). Lingvističeskaja terminologija slovarja. In Novyj ob"jasnitel'nyj slovar' sinonimov russkogo jazyka, Ju. Apresjan et al. (eds.), viii-XLV. Vtoroj vypusk, Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury.
5. _ (2000b). [The synonym series OŠIBAT'SJA.] In Novyj ob"jasnitel'nyj slovar' sinonimov russkogo jazyka, Ju. Apresjan et al. (eds.), 261-266. Vtoroj vypusk, Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury.
6. _; and Páll, Erna (1982). Orosz ige - magyar ige. Vonzatok és kapcsolódások [Russian Verb -Hungarian Verb. Government and Co-occurrence]. Budapest: Tankõnyvkiadó.
7. Barwise, Jon; and Perry, John (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Beck, David (2002). The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems: The Markedness of Adjectives. New York: Routledge.
9. Boguslavskij, Igor' (1985). Issledovanija po sintaksičeskoj semantike. Moscow: Nauka.
10. _ (1990). Vnešnjaja i vnutrennjaja sfera dejstvija nekotoryx temporal'nyx obstojatel'stv. In Metody formalne w opisie jȩjzyḱow slowiańskich (Ju.D. Apresjanu k šestidesjatiletiju), Z. Saloni (ed.), 137-148. Biatystok: Filija UW.
11. Bonami, Olivier (1999). Les constructions du verbe: le cas des groupes pépositionnels argumentaux. Analyse syntaxique, sémantique et lexicale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universié Paris VII.
12. Davies, William; and Dubinsky, Stanley (2001). Objects and Other Subjects. Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories and Configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Davis, Anthony; and Koenig, Jean-Pierre (2000). Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language 76(1), 56-91.
14. Engel, Ulrich et al. (1983). Valenzlexicon Deutsch-Rumänisch - Dictionar de valenta german-român. Deutsch im Kontrast, Band 3. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
15. _; and Schumacher, H. (1976). Kleines Valenzlexicon deutscher Verben. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für deutsche Sprache, Mannheim, 31. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
16. Escandell Vidal, Victoria (1995). Los complementos del nombre. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
17. Feuillet, Jack (ed.) (1998). Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Fillmore, Charles (1968). The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. _ (1977). The case for case reopened. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8. Grammatical Relations, P. Cole and J. Saddock (eds.), 59-81. New York: Academic Press.
20. Godard, Danièle (1996). Les phrases compléments de Nom sont-elles des arguments? In Les noms abstraits: histoire et théories, N. Flaux, M. Glatigny, and D. Samau (eds.), 301-311. Lille: Presses du Septentrion.
21. Goldberg, Adele; and Ackerman, Farrel (2001). The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4), 798-814.
22. Grimshaw, Jane (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hays, David (1964). Dependency theory: a formalism and some observations. Language 40(4), 511-525.
24. Heibig, Gerhard (1992). Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
25. -; and Schenkel, Wolfgang (1983). Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
26. Hockett, Charles (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
27. Hudson, Richard (1980). Constituency and dependency. Linguistics 18(3/4), 179-198.
28. _ (1993). Recent developments in dependency theory. In Syntax. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, vol. 1, J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and Th. Vennemann (eds.), 329-338. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
29. Iordanskaja, Lidija; and Mel'čuk, Igor (1996). K semantike russkix pričnnyx predlogov (IZ-ZA ljubvi ∼ OT ljubvi ∼ IZ ljubvi ∼ S ljubvi ∼ PO ljubvi). The Moscow Linguistic Journal 2, 162-211.
30. _; and Mel'čuk, Igor (2002). Conversif ou causatif? Cahiers de lexicologie 80(1), 105-119.
31. Krejdlin, Grigorij; and Raxilina, Ekaterina (1984). Semaničeskij analiz voprosno-otvetnyx struktur so slovom "kakoj." Izvestija AN SSSR, SLJa 43(5), 457-470.
32. Lazard, Gilbert (1995). La définition des actants. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd'hui, F. Madray-Lesigne and J. Richard-Zappella (eds.), 151-158. Paris: Peeters.
33. _ (1998 [1994]). L'actance. Paris: PUF. [Translation: (1998). Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]
34. _ (1998 [1994]). L'actance. Paris: PUF. [Translation: (1998). Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]
35. _ (1998). Définition des actants dans les langues européennes. In Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe, Jack Feuillet (ed.), 12-146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Lehmann, Christian (1991). Relationality and the grammatical operation. In Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, H. Seiler and W. Premper (eds.), 13-28. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
37. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (1978). Harlow: Longman.
38. McCawley, James (1970). Semantic representation. In Cognition: A Multiple View, P. Garvin (ed.), 227-247. New York: Spartan Books.
39. Mel'čuk, Igor (1988a). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
40. _ (1988b). Semantic description of lexical units in an Explanatory Combinatorial Dictionary: basic principles and heuristic criteria. International Journal of Lexicography 1(3), 165-188.
41. _ (1992). Paraphrase et lexique: la théorie Sens-Texte et le Dictionnaire Explicatif et Combinatoire. In Mel'čuk et al. 1992: 9-58.
42. _ (1996). Lexical functions: A tool for the description of lexical relations in the lexicon. In Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing, L. Wanner (ed.), 37-102. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43. _ (1997a). Vers une linguistique Sens-Texte. Leçon inaugurale. Paris: Collège de France.
44. _ (1997b). Cas grammaticaux, construction verbale de base et voix en massaï: vers une meilleure analyse de concepts. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 92(1), 49-113.
45. _ (1998). Collocations and lexical functions. In Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications, A. P. Cowie (ed.), 23-53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. _ (1999 [1974]). Opyt teorii lingvističeskix modelej "Smysl ⇔ Tekst." Semantika, Sintaksis. Moscow: Nauka.
47. _ (2001). Communicative Organization in Natural Language. The Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
48. _ (2002). Language: dependency, In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, N.J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes (eds.), 8336-8344. Oxford: Pergamon.
49. _ et al. (1984-1999). Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques I-IV. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
50. _ Clas, André; and Polguère, Alain (1995). Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
51. _ and Xolodovič, Aleksandr (1970). Zalog (Opredelenie. Isčislenie). Narody Azii i Afriki 4, 111-124.
52. _; and Zholkovsky, Alexander (1984). Explanatory Combinatorial Dictionary of Modern Russian. Vienna: Wiener Slawistischer Almanack
53. Mosel, Ulrike (1991). Towards a typology of valency. In Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, H. Seiler and W. Premper (eds.), 240-251. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
54. Müller-Gotama, F. (1994). Grammatical Relations. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on their Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
55. Padučeva, Elena (1997). Semantičeskie roli i problema soxranenija invarianta pri leksičeskoj derivacii. Naučno-texničeskaja informacija 2(1), 18-30.
56. _ (1998). Kommunikativnoe vydelenie na urovne sintaksisa i semantiki. In Semiotika i informatika, 82-107. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury/Russkie slovari.
57. _ (2002). Diateza i diatetičeskij sdvig. Russian Linguistics 26(2), 179-215.
58. Panevová, Jarmila (1994). Valency frames and the meaning of the sentence. In The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, Ph. Luelsdorff (ed.), 223-243. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
59. Plank, Frans (1990). Objets trouvés. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43(1), 59-85.
60. Plungjan, Vladimir; and Raxilina, Ekaterina (1990). Sirkonstanty v tolkovanii? In Metody formalne w opisie jȩzyków slowiánskich (Juriju Derenikoviču Apresjanu k šestidesjatiletiju), Z. Saloni (ed.), 201-210. Bialystok: Fuija UW.
61. _; and Raxilina, Ekaterina (1998). Paradoksy valentnostej. In Semiotika i informatika, 108-119. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury/Russkie slovari.
62. Raxilina, Ekaterina (1990). Semantika ili sintaksis? (K analizu častnyx voprosov v russkom jazyke). Munich: Otto Sagner.
63. _ (2000). Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyx imen: semantika i sočetaemost'. Moscow: Russkie slovari.
64. Sgall, Petr; and Panevová, Jarmila (1988-1989). Dependency syntax - a challenge. Theoretical Linguistics 15(1), 73-86.
65. SiI (1998). Semiotika i informatika, vyp 36. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury/Russkie slovari.
66. Somers, Harold (1987). Valency and Case in Computational Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
67. Tesnière, Lucien (1959). Éĺments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
68. Van Valin, Robert; and LaPolla, Randy (1997). Syntax, Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Wechsler, Stephen (1995). The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
70. Whaley, Lindsay (1997). Introduction to Typology. The Unity and Diversity of Language. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
71. Žolkovskij, Aleksandr (1964). O pravilax semantičeskogo analiza. Mašinnyj perevod i prikladnaja lingvistika 8, 17-32.
72. _; Leont'eva, Nina; and Martem'janov, Jurij (1961). O principial'nom ispol'zovanii smysla pri mašinnom perevode. In Mašinnyj perevod 2, 17-46. Moscow: Institut točnoj mexaniki i vyčislitel'noj texniki AN SSSR.
73. _; and Mel'čuk, Igor (1965). O vozmožnom metode i instrumentax semantičeskogo sinteza. Naučno-texničeskaja informacija 5, 23-28.
74. _ and Mel'cuk, Igor (1967). O semantičeskom sinteze. Problemy kibernetiki 19, 177-238.