Natural Channel Design: How Does Rosgen Classification-Based Design Compare with Other Methods?

Proceedings of the 2001 Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 813-822

  Miller, Dale E ^a   Skidmore, Peter B ^b  

^a Inter Fluve Incorporated   (United States)

^b ABBOTT LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC HABITATS; FLOODPLAINS; NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN;

BANK PROTECTION; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RESTORATION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTS; SITE SELECTION; STABILIZATION;

STREAM FLOW;

EID: 1642372317     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Ashmore, P. 1999. What would we do without Rosgen?: Rational regime relations and natural channels. Second Intl. Conference on Natural Systems Design, Niagara Falls, Canada.
2. Chang, H.H. 1988. Fluvial processes in river engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
3. Doyle, M.W. and J.M. Harbor. 2000. Discussion of "Evaluation of Rosgen's streambank erosion potential assessment in Northeast Oklahoma" by R.D. Harmel, C.T. Haan, and R.C. Dutnell. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(5): 1191-1192.
4. Doyle, M.W. and J.M. Harbor. 2001. Discussion of "Rapid assessment of channel stability in vicinity of road crossing". Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(1).
5. Doyle, M.W., D.E. Miller, and J.M. Harbor. 1999. Should river restoration be based on classification schemes or process models? Insights from the history of geomorphology. In: 1999 ASCE River Restoration Mini-Symposium of the International Water Resources Engineering Conference. Seattle, WA.
6. Fripp, J., R. Copeland, and M. Jonas. 2001. An overview of the USAGE stream restoration guidelines. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, March 2001, Reno, NV.
7. Frissell, C.A. and R.K. Nawa. 1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12: 182-197.
8. Goodwin, C.N. 1999. Fluvial classification: Neanderthal necessity or needless normalcy? In: Proceedings AWRA Wildland Hydrology, June 1999, Bozeman, MT.
9. Harmel, R.D., C.T. Haan, and R.C. Dutnell. 1999. Evaluation of Rosgen's streambank erosion potential assessment in Northeast Oklahoma. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(1): 113-121.
10. Jonas, M. The hydraulic engineer's role in stream restoration projects. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, March 2001, Reno, NV.
11. Kondolf, G.M. 1995. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 5(148): 1-15.
12. Langendoen, E.J. 2000. CONCEPTS - Conservational Channel Evolution and Pollutant Transport System. Research Report No. 16. USD A-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS.
13. Miller, D.E. 1999. Deformable stream banks: can we call it a natural channel design without them? In: Proceedings of AWRA Specialty Conference, Science Into Policy: Water in the Public Realm and Wildland Hydrology, June-July, 1999, Bozeman, MT.
14. Miller, D.E. and P.B. Skidmore. 1998. The concept of deformable banks for stream bank stabilization and reconstruction. In: ASCE Bank Stabilization Mini-Symposium of the International Water Resources Engineering Conference, August 1998, Memphis, TN.
15. Miller, D.E. and P.B. Skidmore. 2001. A foundation for standard of practice in natural channel design: Using design criteria to describe success and failure. Book chapter in preparation, based on presentation at the 2001 Society for Ecological Restoration Regional Conference: Restoration and Recovery: Beyond Good Intentions, April 2001, Bellevue, WA.
16. MDEQ (Montana Department of Environmental Quality). 1995. Applied fluvial geomorphology course evaluation summary, letter dated August 30, 1995, from Bob Bukantis MDEQ Water Quality Division to course participants.
17. MFWP (Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks). 1998. Request for proposal for the renaturalization of Trout Creek.
18. MFWP (Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks). 2000a. Request for proposal for the Lost Creek diversion project.
19. MFWP (Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks). 2000b. Request for proposal for the Upper Willow Creek restoration project.
20. NCDENR (North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources). 2001. Clean Water Management Trust Fund grant application.
21. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1998. Stream corridor restoration: principles, processes and practices. National Engineering Handbook, Part 653. Washington, DC.
22. Parrett, C, J.A. Hull, and R.J. Omang. 1987. Revised techniques for estimating peak discharges from channel width in Montana. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 87-4121.
23. Rinaldi, M. and P.A. Johnson. 1997. Stream meander restoration. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 33(4):855-866.
24. th Trout Stream Habitat Improvement Workshop. August 1986. Lock Haven, PA.
25. Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 22: 169-199.
26. Rosgen, D.L. 1996a. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
27. Rosgen, D.L. 1996b. Discussion of "A classification of natural rivers: reply to the comments by J.R. Miler and J.B. Ritter". Catena, 27: 301-307.
28. Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The reference reach: a blueprint for natural channel design. In: Proceedings: Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, ASCE, March 1998, Denver, CO.
29. Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A hierarchical river stability/watershed-based sediment assessment methodology. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, March 2001, Reno, NV.
30. Schumm, S.A. 1984. River morphology and behavior: problems with extrapolation. In: River meandering. C.M. Elliot, ed. ASCE, New York, NY.
31. Schumm, S.A., M.D. Harvey, and C.C. Watson. 1984. Incised channels: morphology, dynamics and control. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
32. Seehorn, M.E. 1985. Fish habitat improvement handbook. U.S. Forest Service. Southern Region. Technical Publication R8-TP7.
33. Shields, F.D. Jr. 1996. Hydraulic and hydrologic stability. In: River channel restoration: guiding principals for sustainable projects. Edited by A. Brooks and F.D. Shields Jr. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
34. Skidmore, P.B., F.D. Shields, M. W. Doyle, and D.E. Miller 2001. A categorization of approaches to natural channel design. In: Proceedings: Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, ASCE, August 2001, Reno, NV.
35. Soar, P.J., R.R. Copeland, and C.R. Thorne. 2001. Channel restoration design for meandering rivers. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, March 2001, Reno, NV.
36. Stream Systems Technology Center. 2001. Forest Service stream classification: adoption of a first approximation. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. April.
37. Thomas, W.A., R.R Copeland, N.K. Raphelt, and D.N. McComas. 1994. Users manual for the SAM hydraulic design package for channels, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.