Regional Variations in the Thickness of Cervical Spine Endplates as Measured by Computed Tomography

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 53-58

  Schmitz, B ^a   Pitzen, T ^b   Beuter, T ^b   Steudel, W I ^b   Reith, W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cervical spine; Computed tomography; Endplate

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASES; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MAPPING; STATISTICS;

BONE GRAFTS; CERVICAL SPINE ENDPLATES;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CADAVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 1642367867     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850410000755     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805-21.
2. Caspar W, Barbier D, Klara PM. Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 1989;25:491-502.
3. Caspar W. Die ventrale interkorporale Stabilisierung mit der HWS - Trapez - Osteosyntheseplatte. Indikationen, Technik, Ergebnisse. Ortho. Praxis 1984;12:981-8.
4. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured discs. J Neurosurg 1958;15:602-17.
5. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RNA, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. NeuroImage 2001;14:21-36.
6. Hollowell JP, Vollmer DG, Wilson CR, Printar FA, Yoganandan N. Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate? Spine 1996;21:1032-6.
7. Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, et al. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine 2001;26:951-6.
8. Panjabi MM, Chen NC, Shin EK, Wang JL. The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies. Spine 2001;26:2478-84.
9. Pitzen TR, Matthis D, Barbier DD, Steudel WI. Initial stability of cervical spine fixation: prediction of a finite element model. J Neurosurg 2002;97 Suppl:128.
10. Schmitz B, Schaefer T, Krick CM, Reith W, Backens M, Kaesmann-Kellner B. Configuration of the optic chiasm in human albinos as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:16-21.
11. Silva MJ, Wang C, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC, Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. Bone 1994;15:409-14.
12. Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Aebi M. Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs. Spine 2000;25:1077-84.
13. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Claes L. Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. Eur Spine J 2000;9:410-16.
14. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, Claes L. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements. Spine 2000;25:2762-70.