Predictive Bayesian dose-response assessment for appraising absolute health risk from available information

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 69-78

  Englehardt, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute; Bayesian; Comparative risk; Dose response; Predictive; Rotavirus

Indexed keywords

ROTAVIRUS;

EID: 1642367264     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490280963     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Abramowitz M and Stegun I (eds). 1965. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover Publications, NY, NY, USA
2. Aitchison J and Dunsmore I. 1975. Statistical Prediction Analysis. Cambridge University Press, NY, NY, USA
3. An H. 2000. The Use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Gibbs Sampling to Determine Reference Dose in Health Risk Assessment. Masters Thesis. University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
4. Baird S, Cohen J, Graham J, et al. 1996. Noncancer risk assessment: Probabilistic characterization of population threshold doses. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:79-102
5. Crump K. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fund Applied Toxicol 4:854-71
6. Dourson M, Felter S, and Robinson D. 1996. Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 24:108-20
7. Eadie W. [and others] 1971. Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
8. Englehardt J. 1995. Predicting incident size from limited information. J Environ Engineering 121(6):455-64
9. Furumoto W and Mickey R. 1967. A mathematical model for the infectivity-dilution curve of tobacco mosaic virus: Theoretical considerations. Virology 32:216
10. Gilks W, Richardson S, and Spiegelhalter D. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. CRC Press, Chapman & Hal, Boca Raton, FL, USA
11. Haas C, Rose J, and Gerba C. 1999. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NY, NY, USA
12. Haas C, Crockett C, Rose J, et al. 1996. Assessing the risk posed by oocysts in drinking water. Am Water Works J 88(9):131
13. Simon T. 1997. Combining physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling with Monte Carlo simulation to derive an acute inhalation guidance value for trichloroethylene. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 26:257-70
14. Slob W and Pieters M. 1998. A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: General Framework. Risk Anal 18:787-98
15. Spanier J and Oldham. 1987. An Atlas of Functions. Hemisphere Publishing Corp, Washington, DC, USA
16. Swartout J, Price P, Dourson M, et al. 1998. A probabilistic framework for the reference dose (probabilistic RfD. Risk Anal 18:271-82
17. Teunis P, Nagelkerke N, and Haas C. 1999. Dose response models for infectious gastroenteritis. Risk Analysis 19(6):1251-60
18. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1996. Valuing Potential Environmental Liabilities for Managerial Decision-Making: A Review of Available Techniques. Report EPA742-R-96-003. Washington, DC, USA
19. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Drinking water; national primary drinking water regulations; filtration, disinfection; turbidity, Giardia lamblia, viruses, Legionella, and heterotrophic bacteria. Fed Reg 54(issue 124):27486-603 (54 FR 27486)
20. Zhang S and Jin J. 1996. Computation of Special Functions. John Wiley and Sons, NY, NY, USA