UPlan A Versatile Urban Growth Model for Transportation Planning

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1831, 2003, Pages 202-209

  Johnston, Robert A ^a   Shabazian, David R ^b   Gao, Shengyi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Sacramento Area Cncl of Governments   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EROSION; FIRE PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; PUBLIC POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING; SEWER LININGS;

FLOODPLAINS; GRASSLANDS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 1642362413     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1831-23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. FHWA. Land Development Patterns. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/toolbox/land_develop_forecasting.htm. Accessed Sept. 10, 2002.
2. NCHRP Report 423A: Land Use Impacts of Transportation: A Guidebook. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
3. Wegener, M. Operational Urban Models: State of the Art. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1994, pp. 17-29.
4. Miller, E. J., D. S. Kriger, and J. D. Hunt. TCRP "Web Document 9: Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land-Use Policies. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1998.
5. Special Report 245: Expanding Metropolitan Highways: Implications for Air Quality and Energy Use. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
6. Rodier, C. J., J. E. Abraham, R. A. Johnston, and J. D. Hunt. Comparison of Highway and Travel Demand Management Measures Using Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model in the Sacramento Region. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
7. Projecting Land-Use Change: A Summary of Models for Assessing the Effects of Community Growth and Change on Land-Use Patterns. USEPA Report EPA/600/R-00/098. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Sept. 2000.
8. Heikkila, E. J. GIS Is Dead; Long Live GIS! Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 3, 1998, pp. 350-360.
9. Landis, J. D. The California Urban Futures Model: A New Generation of Metropolitan Simulation Models. Environment and Behavior B, Vol.21, 1994, pp. 399-420.
10. Landis, J. D. Imagining Land Use Futures: Applying the California Urban Futures Model. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1995, pp. 438-457.
11. Clarke, K., S. Hoppen, and L. J. Gaydos. Methods and Techniques for Rigorous Calibration of a Cellular Automaton Model of Urban Growth, 1996. geo/arc/nasa.gov/usgs/clarke/calib.paper.html.
12. Clarke, K., et al. An Analysis of Human-Induced Land Transformations in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento Area, 1996. geo/arc/nasa.gov/usgs/WRR_paper.html.
13. Clarke, K. C., and S. Hoppen. A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 247-261.
14. Landis, J., and M. Zhang. The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 1: Model Logic and Theory. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1998, pp. 657-666.
15. Landis, J., and M. Zhang. The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 2: Specification and Calibration Results of the Land-Use Change Submodel. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1998, pp. 795-824.
16. Lowry, I. S. A Model of Metropolis. RM-4035-RC. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 1964.
17. Marshall, N. L., and S. J. C. Lawe. Land Use Allocation Modeling in Uni-Centric and Multi-Centric Regions. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.
18. Klosterman, R. E. The What If? Collaborative Planning Support System. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 26, 1999, pp. 393-408.
19. Fulton, W., R. Pendall, M. Nguyen, and A. Harrison. Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Growth, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., July 2001.
20. Johnston, R. A., and T. de la Barra. Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems. Transportation Research A, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 125-136.
21. Frank, J. E. The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 1989.
22. Nearing, M. A. A Single, Continuous Function for Slope Steepness Influence on Soil Loss. Soil Science Society American Journal, Vol. 61, 1997, pp. 917-919.
23. Daly, C., G. Taylor, and W. Gibson. The PRISM Approach to Mapping Precipitation and Temperature. Proc., 10th Conference on Applied Climatology, Reno, Nev., American Meteorological Society, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 10-12.
24. Reynolds, K. Netweaver for EMDS User Guide (Version 1.1): A Knowledge Base Development System. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-471. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oreg., 1999.
25. Saunders, M. C., E. G. Rajotte, and J. W. Travis. The Use and Significance of Expert Systems in Small Fruit IPM. In Monitoring and Integrated Management of Arthropod Pests of Small Fruit Crops (N. J. Bostanian, D. T. Wilson, and T. J. Dennehy, eds.), Intercept, London, 1989.
26. Saunders, M. C., R. N. Coulson, and J. Folse. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. In Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology (A. Kent and J. Williams, eds.), Vol. 25, Suppl. 10, Dekker, New York, 1990, pp. 1-14.
27. Reynolds, K., P. Cunningham, L. Bednar, et al. A Design Framework for a Knowledge-Based Information Management System for Water-shed Analysis in the Pacific Northwest U.S. AI Applications, Vol. 10, 1996, pp. 9-22.