Effect of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate coating on osseointegration of plasma-sprayed titanium alloy implants

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-10

  Stewart, Matthew ^a   Welter, Jean F ^b   Goldberg, Victor M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydroxyapatite; Implant stability; Osseointegration; Osteoconduction; Plasma sprayed titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BONE; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CERAMIC COATINGS; HYDROXYAPATITE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PLASMA SPRAYING; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

OSSEOINTEGRATION;

BIOMATERIALS;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT VERSUS HOST REACTION; IMPLANT; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PLASMA; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 1642343895     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.20071     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Coathup MJ, Blunn GW, Flynn N, Willliams C, Thomas NP. A comparison of bone remodeling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Jt Surg 2001;83-A:118-123.
2. Emerson RH, Sanders SB, Head WC, Higgins L. Effect of circumferential plasma-spray porous coating on the rate of femoral osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 1999;81-A:1291-1298.
3. Rahbek O, Overgaard S, Lind M, Bendix K, Bunger C, Søballe K. Sealing effect of hydroxyapatite coating on peri-implant migration of particles: An experimental study in dogs. J Bone Jt Surg 2001;83-B:441-447.
4. Burr DB, Mori S, Boyd RD, Sun TC, Blaha JD, Lane L, Parr J. Histomorphometric assessment of the mechanisms for rapid ingrowth of bone to HA/TCP coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:645-653.
5. Cook SD, Thomas KA, Dalton JE, Volkman TK, Whitecloud TS III, Kay JF. Hydroxylapatite coating of porous implants improves bone ingrowth and interfacial attachment strength. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:989-1001.
6. Dalton JE, Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kay JF. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Jt Surg 1995;77A:97-110.
7. Dean JC, Tisdel CL, Goldberg VM, Parr J, Davy D, Stevenson S. Effects of hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate coating and intracancellous placement on bone ingrowth in titanium fiber-metal implants. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:830-838.
8. Jinno T, Davy DT, Goldberg VM. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate coatings. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:902-909.
9. Karabatsos B, Myerthall SL, Fornasier VL, Binnington A, Maistrelli GL. Osseointegration of hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants in a canine model. Clin Orthop 2002; 392:442-449.
10. Maistrelli GL, Mahomed N, Fornasier VL, Antonelli L, Li Y, Birmington A. Functional osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a weight-bearing canine model. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:549-554.
11. Svehla M, Morberg P, Bruce W, Zicat B, Walsh WR. The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:304-311.
12. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Manley MT. Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Jt Surg 2003;85-A:885-889.
13. Gejo R, Akizuki S, Takizawa T. Fixation of the NexGen HA-TCP-coated cementless, screwless total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same type. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:449-456.
14. Onsten I, Nordqvist A, Carlsson AS, Besjakov J, Shott S. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components: A randomised RSA study of 116 patients. J Bone Jt Surg 1998;80-B:417-425.
15. Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I. Hydroxyapatite coating improves 8- to 10-year performance of the link RS cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:172-175.
16. Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Harvey EJ, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Relative contributions of chemistry and topography to the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings. Clin Orthop 2002;405:24-38.
17. Tay BKB, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes: Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clinics 1999;30:615-623.
18. Anderson GI, Orlando K, Waddell JP. Synovitis subsequent to total-hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite: A study in dogs. Vet Surg 2001;30:311-318.
19. David A, Eitenmuller J, Muhr G, Pommer A, Bar HF, Osterman PA, Schildhaauer TA. Mechanical and histological evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated, titanium-coated and grit-blasted surfaces under weight-bearing conditions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:112-118.
20. Hayashi K, Inadome T, Tsumura H, Nakashima Y, Sugioka Y. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium on the bone-implant interface shear strength. Biomaterials 1994;15:1187-1191.
21. Hayashi K, Inadome T, Mashima T, Sugioka Y. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:557-563.
22. Lai KA, Shen WJ, Chen CH, Yang CY, Hu WP, Chang GL. Failure of hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups: Ten-year follow-up of 85 Landos Atoll arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg 2002; 84-B:641-646.
23. Lee TM, Wang BC, Yang YC, Chang E, Yang CY. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate composite coatings: In vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:360-367.
24. Reikeras O, Gunderson RB. Failure of HA coating on a grit-blasted acetabular cup: 155 patients followed for 7-10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:104-108.
25. Wen J, Leng Y, Chen J, Zhang C. Chemical gradient in plasma-sprayed HA coatings. Biomaterials 2000;21:1339-1343.
26. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, Parr JA, Stevenson S. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Jt Surg 1995;77-A:1380-1395.
27. Tisdel CL, Goldberg VM, Parr JA, Bensusan JS, Staikoff LS, Stevenson S. The influence of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. J Bone Jt Surg 1994;76-A:159-71.
28. Moroni A, Caja VL, Egger EL, Trinchese L, Chao EY. Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants. Biomaterials 1994;15:926-930.
29. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Chipman M, Valiquette N, Carter S, De Groot K. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-1345.
30. Overgaard S, Lind M, Glerup H, Bunger C, Søballe K. Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: Mechanical and histomorphometric results. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:449-458.
31. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Pederson CM, Bünger C. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants: A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit. Acta Orthop Scand 1990;61:299-306.
32. Thomas KA, Cook SD, Haddad RJ Jr, Kay JF, Jarcho M. Biologic response to hydroxyapatite-coated titanium hips: A preliminary study in dogs. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:43-53.
33. Lind M, Overgaard S, Bünger C, Søballe K. Improved bone anchorage of hydroxyapatite coated implants compared with tricalcium-phosphate coated implants in trabecular bone in dogs. Biomaterials 1999;20:803-808.
34. Mouzin O, Soballe K, Bechtold JE. Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:61-68.
35. Chang YL, Lew D, Park JB, Keller JC. Biochemical and morphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:1096-1108.
36. Heck DA, Nakajima I, Kelly PJ, Chao EY. The effect of load alteration on the biological and biochemical performance of a titanium fiber-metal segmental prosthesis. J Bone Jt Res 1986; 68-A:118-126.
37. Overgaard S, Søballe K, Josephsen K, Hansen ES, Bünger C. Role of different loading conditions on resorption of hydroxyapatite coating evaluated by histomorphometric and stereological methods. J Orthop Res 1996,14:888-894.
38. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, Jørgensen PH, Bünger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992;10:285-299.
39. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bünger C. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Jt Surg 1993;75-B:270-278.
40. Zhang C, Leng Y, Chen J. In vitro mechanical integrity of hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti-6Al-4V implants under shear loading. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:342-350.
41. Overgaard S, Lind M, Rahbek O, Bünger C, Søballe K. Improved fixation of porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:337-343.
42. Shen WJ, Chung KC, Wang GJ, McLaughlin RE. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite- and polysulfone-coated titanium rods in a weight-bearing canine model. J Arthroplasty 1992;7: 43-49.