Using the ETS Major Field Test in Business: Implications for Assessment

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 51-56

  Mirchandani, Dilip ^a   Lynch, Robert ^a   Hamilton, Diane ^a  

^a ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642341731     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320109599671     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Chamberlain, D., and Seay, R., 1990. Outcomes assessment: A new challenge for business educators. Journal of Education for Business, 65 (2): 202–205.
2. nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Educational Testing Service. 1999. Major Field Tests: Comparative data guide, academic year 1998–1999, Princeton, NJ: Author.
4. Henninger, E., 1994. Outcomes assessment: The role of business school and program accrediting agencies. Journal of Education for Business, 69 (5): 296–299.
5. Johnson, R., McCormick, R., Prus, J., and Rogers, J., 1993. “ Assessment options for the college major ”. In Making a difference: Outcomes of a decade of assessment in higher education, Edited by: Banta, T., 151–167. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
6. Poje, D., 1996. “ Student motivation and standardized testing for institutional assessment ”. In Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses, Edited by: Banta, T., 179–181. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
7. Rudolph, L., 1996. “ Looking beneath standardized test scores ”. In Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses, Edited by: Banta, T., 186–189. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
8. Sacks, P., 1997. Standardized testing. Change, 29 (2): 24–31.
9. rd ed., New York: Harper Collins.
10. Young, C., 1996. “ Triangulated assessment of the major ”. In Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses, Edited by: Banta, T., 101–103. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.