Gender variety as a valid choice: A comment on the HFEA - Response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 270-271

  Robertson, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Embryo; Ethics; HFEA; Sex selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL SELECTION; EMBRYOLOGY; FERTILIZATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LAW; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROGENY; PUBLIC OPINION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 1642340538     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60908-X     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. American Society of Reproductive Medicine 2001 Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertility and Sterility 75, 861-864.
2. Dahl E 2004 The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 266-267.
3. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 2003 Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA's 2002-2003 Review of Sex Selection Including Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options. HFEA, London.
4. Robertson JA 2001 Preconception gender selection. American Journal Bioethics 1, 2-9.
5. Robertson JA 2002 Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 78, 463.