Laboratory Earthquakes: The Sub-Rayleigh-to-Supershear Rupture Transition

Science

Volumn 303, Issue 5665, 2004, Pages 1859-1861

  Xia, Kaiwen ^a,b   Rosakis, Ares J ^b   Kanamori, Hiroo ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRICTION; NUCLEATION; VISUALIZATION;

RUPTURE TRANSITIONS; SUPERSHEAR RUPTURE;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT PROPAGATION; LABORATORY METHOD;

ARTICLE; EARTHQUAKE; FACILITATION; MODEL; PHASE TRANSITION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUPTURE; SHEAR STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; VELOCITY;

EID: 1642339840     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1094022     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A. Lin et al., Science 296, 2015 (2002).
2. M. Bouchon, M. Vallee, Science 301, 824 (2003).
3. R. J. Archuleta, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 4559 (1984).
4. P. Spudich, E. Cranswick, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 2083 (1984).
5. K. B. Olsen, R. Madariaga, R. J. Archuleta, Science 278, 834 (1997).
6. M. Bouchon et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 2723 (2001).
7. W. L. Ellsworth et al., paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Berkeley, CA, 7 to 9 January 2004.
8. R. Burridge, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 35, 439 (1973).
9. R. Burridge, G. Conn, L. B. Freund, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2210 (1979).
10. D. J. Andrews, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 5679 (1976).
11. S. Das, K. Aki, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 50, 643 (1977).
12. S. M. Day, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1881 (1982).
13. R. Madariaga, K. B. Olsen, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 1981 (2000).
14. E. M. Dunham, P. Favreau, J. M. Carlson, Science 299, 1557 (2003).
15. A. J. Rosakis, O. Samudrala, D. Coker, Science 284, 1337 (1999).
16. A. J. Rosakis, Adv. Phys. 51, 1189 (2002).
17. Before the triggering of the discharge, the fault system is in equilibrium because the resolved shear traction along the fault is balanced by the static friction strength. After triggering, the expansion of the high-pressure plasma at the simulated hypocenter creates a pressure pulse that releases the local normal pressure of the interface, thus dropping the level of frictional resistance. The resultant net driving force then initiates bilateral slip along the fault. The slip and slip rate reduce the coefficient of friction (slip and/or slip rate weakening) and hence, for a large enough inclination angle α, the rupture is able to continue. Thus, simulated earthquakes are triggered in the laboratory.
18. D. J. Andrews, Y. BenZion, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 553 (1997).
19. A. Cochard, J. R. Rice, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 25891 (2000).
20. p. This transition was visualized by two-dimensional atomistic calculations of shear rupture in the microscale (27).
21. A. C. Palmer, J. R. Rice, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 332, 527 (1973).
22. M. Ohnaka, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 10.1029/2000JB000123 (2003).
23. F. P. Bowden, D. Tabor, The Friction and Lubrication of Solids (Clarenden Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 374.
24. S. Ide, M. Takeo, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 27379 (1997).
25. L. B. Freund, Dynamic Fracture Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990), p. 563.
26. K. B. Broberg, Cracks and Fracture (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1999), p. 752.
27. F. F. Abraham, H. J. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3113 (2000).
28. Authors appreciate fruitful discussions with T. Heaton and G. Ravichandran from Caltech and J. R. Rice from Harvard. This study is supported by NSF grant EAR-0207873 and Office of Naval Research grant N00014-03-1-043S.