Difficulty for consensus in simultaneous opinion formation of Sznajd model

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 25-33

  Stauffer, Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer Simulation; Opinion Dynamics; Sociophysics

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642331635     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222500490278531     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albert, R. & Barabási, A. L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physica, 74, 47-97.
2. Aleksiejuk, A., Holyst, J. A., & Stauffer, D. (2002). Ferromagnetic Phase Transition in Barabási-Albert Networks. Physica A, 310, 260-266.
3. Axelrod, R. J. (1997). Conflict Resolut, 41, 203-226.
4. Ben-Naim, E. Kaprivsky, P. L., & Redner, S. (2003). cond-mat/0212313 on e-print server arXiv.org. Physica D, 183, 190-204.
5. Gallen, E. & Shapero, D. A Theory of Social Imitation. Physics Today, July 1974, 23-28.
6. Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., & Faure, T. (2002). How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction mortal. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, issue 4, paper 1 (jasas.soc.surrey.ac.uk).
7. Galam, S., Gefen, Y., & Shapin, Y. (1982). Sociophysics: A mean behavior model for the process of strike. J. Mathematical Sociology, 9, 1-13.
8. Hegselmann, R. & Krause, M. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, issue 3, paper 2 (jasas.soc.surrey.ac.uk).
9. Klemm, K., Eguiluz, V. M., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. Nonequilibrlum transitions in complex networks: A model of social Interaction. Phys. Rev. E, 67, 026120 (2003) and Physica A, 327, 1-5. (2003).
10. Klemm, K., Eguiluz, V. M., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. Nonequilibrlum transitions in complex networks: A model of social Interaction. Phys. Rev. E, 67, 026120 (2003) and Physica A, 327, 1-5. (2003).
11. Kobayashi, J. (2001). Unanimous Opinions in Social Influence Networks. J. Mathematical Sociology, 24, 285-297.
12. Majorana, E. (1942). II valore delle leggi statistiche nella fisica e nelle scienze sociali. Scientia, 36, 58-66.
13. Noymer, A. (2001). The transmission and persistence of 'urban legends': Sociological application of agestructured epidemic models. J. Mathematical Sociology, 25, 299-323.
14. Schweitzer F. (ed.) (1997). Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics, Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
15. Sabatelli, L. & Richmond, P. (2003). Phase transitions, memory and frustration in a Sznajd-like model with synchronous updating. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 14, issue 9.
16. Sabatelli, L. & Richmond, P. (in press). Non-monotonio Spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like consensus model, Physica A.
17. Sakoda, J. M. (1971). The checkerboard model of social interaction. J. Mathematical Sociology, 1, 119-132.
18. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic Models of Segregation. J. Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143-186.
19. Stauffer, D. (2002). Monte Carlo Simulations of the Sznajd model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, issue 1, paper 4 (jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk).
20. Stauffer, D. (2003). How to convince others? American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 690, 147-165.
21. Stauffer, D. & De Oliveira, P. M. C. (2002). Persistence of opinion in the Sznajd consensus model: computer simulation. Eur. Phys. J. B, 30, 587-592.
22. Sznajd-Weron, K. & Sznajd, J. (2000). Opinion Evolution in Closed Community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 11, 1157-1166.
23. Weidlich, W. (2000). Sociodynamics; A systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences. Harvrood Academic Publishers.