Why Faces Are Not Special to Newborns: An Alternative Account of the Face Preference

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 5-8

  Turati, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cognitive specialization; Face preference; Newborns; Perceptual constraints

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642307570     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301002.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Acerra, F., Burnod, I., & de Schonen, S. (2002). Modelling aspects of face processing in early infancy. Developmental Science, 5, 98-117.
2. Banks, M., & Ginsburg, A.P. (1985). Infant visual preferences: A review and new theoretical treatment. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 207-246). New York: Academic Press.
3. de Schonen, S., & Mathivet, E. (1989). First come, first served: A scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 3-44.
4. Elman, J.L., Bates, E.A., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkelt, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Fantz, R.L. (1963). Pattern vision in newborn infants. Science, 140, 296-297.
6. Johnson, M.H., & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and cognitive development: The case efface recognition. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
7. Kleiner, K.A. (1993). Specific versus non-specific face recognition device? In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition; Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 103-108). New York: Academic Press.
8. Macchi Cassia, V., Turati, C., & Simion, F. (in press). Can a non-specific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns' face preference? Psychological Science.
9. Macchi Cassia, V., Valenza, E., Pividori, D., & Simion, F. (2002, April). Facedness vs non-specific structural properties: What is crucial in determining face preference at birth. Poster presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
10. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C.A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
11. Simion, F., Valenza, E., Macchi Cassia, V., Turati, C., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Newborns' preference for up-down asymmetrical configurations. Developmental Science, 5, 427-434.
12. Turati, C., & Simion, F. (2002). Newborns' recognition of changing and unchanging aspects of schematic faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 239-261.
13. Turati, C., Simion, F., Milani, I., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Newborns preference for faces: What is crucial? Developmental Psychology, 38, 875-882.
14. Valenza, E., Simion, F., Macchi Cassia, V., & Umiltà, C. (1996). Face preference at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 892-903.
15. Werker, J.F., & Vouloumanos, A. (2001). Speech and language processing in infancy: A neurocognitive approach. In C.A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 269-280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.