Contraception trends in Dutch general practice: Differences according to socioeconomic status

European Journal of General Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 54-58

  Doherty, Sarah ^a   Lagro Janssen, Toine ^b   Avery, Tony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

contraception; general practice; socioeconomic status; the Netherlands; trends

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642302041     PISSN: 13814788     EISSN: 17511402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13814789909094260     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. United Nations. Levels and Trends of Contraceptive Use as assessed in 1994. New York: UN Publication, 1996:1-87.
2. Kerting E, Visser A. Contraception in the Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained. Patient Education and Counselling 1994;23:161-71. (Pubitemid 24232845)
3. David H. Abortion in Europe 1920-91: A Public Health Perspective. Stud Fam Plann 1992;23(1):1-19.
4. Doppenberg H. Contraception and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: what can be done? Experiences and Thoughts from the Netherlands. Br J Fam Plann 1993;18:123-5. (Pubitemid 23050361)
5. ONS. Living in Britain, Results from the 1995 General Household Survey. London: The Statistical Office, 1997:144-67.
6. Parker R, Williams M, Nurss J. Literacy and Contraception, Exploring the Link. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(Suppl):72-7.
7. Riphagen F, Lehert P. A Survey of Contraception in Five Western European Countries. J Biosoc Sci 1989;21:23-46. (Pubitemid 19036081)
8. Jones E, Forrest J, Henshaw S, Silverman J, Torres A. Unintended Pregnancy, Contraceptive Practice and Family Planning Services in Developed Countries. Fam Plann Perspect 1988;20(2):53-67.
9. Nederlands institut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidzorg. Utrecht: Continue Morbiditeit Registratie Peilstations Nederland, 1996:65.
10. Nederlands institut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidzorg. Utrecht: Continue Morbiditeit Registratie Peilstations Nederland, 1991:63.
11. Nederlands institut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidzorg. Utrecht: Continue Morbiditeit Registratie Peilstations Nederland, 1983:63.
12. Bosch W van den, Huygen F, Hoogen H van den, Weel C van. Morbidity in Early Childhood: Family Patterns in Relation to Sex, Birth Order and Social Class. Fam Med 1993;25:126-30. (Pubitemid 23093158)
13. Bogaard C van den, Hoogen H van den, Huygen F, Weel C van. The Relationship between Breast Feeding and Early Childhood Morbidity in a General Population. Fam Med 1991;23:510-5.
14. United Nations. Handbook of Household Surveys. New York: United Nations, 1984;65.
15. Weel C van. Validating long term morbidity recording. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:94-7.
16. Royal College of General Practitioners. Mortality among Oral Contraceptive Users. Lancet 1977;2:727-31.
17. Welling K. Trends in Contraceptive Method Usage since 1970. Br J Fam Plann 1986;12:15-22.
18. Oddens B, Arnolds H, Maris M van, Lunsen H van. The Dynamics of Oral Contraceptive Use in the Netherlands 1990-1993. Adv Contracept 1994;10(3):167-74. (Pubitemid 24325958)
19. Jones E, Beniger J, Westoff C. Pill and IUD Discontinuation in the United States, 1970-1975: The Influence of the Media. Fam Plann Perspect 1980;12(22):293-300.
20. Ketting E. Contraception and Fertility in the Netherlands. Fam Plann Perspect 1983;15(l):19-25.
21. Grady W, Klepinger D, Billy J. The Influence of Community Characteristics on the Practice of Effective Contraception. Fam Plann Perspect 1993;25(4):4-11. (Pubitemid 23081433)
22. WHO Contraceptive Method Mix. WHO Geneva 1994:1-64.
23. Condelli L. Social and Attitudinal Determinants of Contraceptive Choice: Using the Health Belief Model, Journal of Sex Research 1986;22(4):478-91. (Pubitemid 17187293)