Parthenocarpy restores fruitfulness in sterile triploid (3x) tomatoes artificially obtained by crossing 4x x 2x somaclones

Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 322-328

  Habashy, A A ^a,b   Testa, G ^a   Mosconi, P ^a   Caccia, R ^a   Mazzucato, A ^a   Santange Lo, E ^a   Soressi, G P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF IRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 1642280569     PISSN: 14620316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2004.11511768     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALLAVENA, A. and SORESSI, G. P. (1978). Tetraploid parthenocarpic fruitful tomatoes. Tomato Genetics Cooperative Report, 28, 2.
2. ANCORA, G., SREE RAMULU, K. and DEVREUX, M. (1977). In vitro culture of anther and stem intemodes of Lycopersicum peruvianum: nuclear DNA determination in calli and cytological analysis of regenerated plants. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenphysiologie, 82, 377-88.
3. ASAHINA, M., IWAI, H., KIKUCHI, A., YAMAGUCHI, S., KAMIYA, Y., KAMADA, H. and SATOH, S. (2002). Gibberellins produced in the cotyledon is required for cell division during tissue reunion in the cortex of cut cucumber and tomato hypocotyls. Plant Physiology, 129, 201-10.
4. BIANCHI, A. and SORESSI, G. P. (1969). Mutanti di pomodoro artificialmente indotti suscettibili di utilizzazione nel miglioramento genetico. Sementi Elette, 15(3), 2-6.
5. COOPER, D. C. and BRINK, R. A. (1945). Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicum pimpinellifolium. Genetics, 30, 371-401.
6. D'AMATO, F. (1978). Chromosome number variation in cultured cells and regenerated plants. In: Frontiers of plant tissue culture 1978. (Thorpe, T. A., Ed.). University of Calgary Printing Services, Calgary, Canada, 287-95.
7. EVANS, D. A. (1986). Case histories of genetic variability in vitro. Tomato. In: Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. (Vasil, I.K., Ed.). Academic Press Inc., Orlando, Florida, USA, 419-34.
8. EVANS, D. A. and SHARP, W. R. (1983). Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture. Science, 221, 949-51.
9. EVANS, D. A., SHARP, W. R. and Medina-Filho, H. P. (1984). Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. American Journal of Botany, 71, 759-74.
10. FALAVIGNA, A. and SORESSI, G. P. (1987). Influence of the pat-sha gene on plant and fruit traits in tomato (L. esculentum Mill.). In: Modern trends in tomato genetics and breeding. Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the EUCARP1A Tomato Working Group, Salerno, Italy, 1987, 128.
11. FOS, M., NUEZ, F. and GARCÍA-MARTÍNEZ, J. L. (2000).The gene pat-2, which induces natural parthenocarpy, alters the gibberellin content in unpollinated tomato ovaries. Plant Physiology, 122, 471-9.
12. GENDREAU, E., ORBOVIC, V., HOFTE, H. and TRAAS, J. (1999). Gibberellin and ethylene control endoreduplication levels in the Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyl. Planta, 209, 513-6.
13. KAGAN-ZUR, V., YARON-MIRON, D. and MIZRAHI, Y. (1991). A study of triploid tomato fruit attributes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 116, 228-31.
14. KOORNNEEF, M., VAN DIEPEN, J. A. M., HANHART, C. J., KIEBOOM-DE WAART, A. C., MARTINELLI, L., SCHOENMAKERS, H. C. H. and WIJBRANDI, J. (1989). Chromosomal instability in cell and tissue cultures of tomato haploids and diploids. Euphytica, 43, 179-86.
15. LESLEY, J. W. (1948). Plant breeding methods and current problems in developing improved varieties of tomatoes. Economic Botany, 2, 100-10.
16. MAPELLI, S., FROVA, C., TORTI, G. and SORESSI, G. P. (1978). Relationship between set, development and activities of growth regulators in tomato fruits. Plant & Cell Physiology, 19, 1281-88.
17. 3 on flowering and fruit-set in a mutant of tomato. HortScience, 14, 1-2.
18. MAZZUCATO, A., TADDEI, A. R. and SORESSI, G. P. (1998). The parthenocarpic fruit (pat) mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) sets seedless fruits and has aberrant anther and ovule development. Development, 125, 107-14.
19. MAZZUCATO, A., TESTA, G. BIANCARI, T. and SORESSI, G. P. (1999). Effect of gibberellic acid treatments, environmental conditions, and genetic background on the expression of the parthenocarpic fruit mutation in tomato. Protoplasma, 208, 18-25.
20. MURASHIGE, T. and SKOOG, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-97.
21. NAGL, W. (1993). Induction of high polyploidy Phaseolus cell cultures by the protein kinase inhibitor, K-252a. Plant Cell Reports, 12, 170-4.
22. NILSSON, E. (1950). Some experiments with tetraploid tomatoes. Hereditas, 36, 181-204.
23. PHILOUZE, J. (1983). Parthénocarpie naturelle chez la tomate I. - Revue bibliographique. Agronomie, 3, 611-20.
24. PHILOUZE, J. (1991). Description of isogenic lines, except for one, or two, monogenically controlled morphological traits in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Euphytica, 56, 121-31.
25. PHILOUZE, J. and MAISONNEUVE, B. (1978). Heredity of the natural ability to set parthenocarpic fruits in the Soviet variety Severianin. Tomato Genetics Cooperative Report, 28, 12-13.
26. PHILOUZE, J. and PECAUT, P. (1986). Parthénocarpie naturelle chez la tomate. III. - Etude de la parthénocarpie due au gene pat (parthenocarpic fruit) de la lignee "Montfavet 191". Agronomie, 6, 243-8.
27. PHILOUZE, J., BURET, M., DUPRAT., NICOLAS-GROTTE, M. and NICOLAS, J. (1988). Caractéristiques agronomiques et physicochimiques de lignées de tomate isogeniques, sauf pour le gène pat-2 de parthénocarpie, dans trois types variétaux, en culture de printemps, sous serre plastique très peu chauffée. Agronomie, 8, 817-28.
28. RICK, C. M. (1945). A survey of cytogenetic causes of unfruitfulness in the tomato. Genetics, 30, 347-62.
29. SANTANGELO, E., BENEDETTELLI, S., TOMASSINI, C. and SORESSI G. P. (1990). Comportamento in tunnel freddo delle versioni quasi isogeniche normale e partenocarpica di tre ibridi di pomodoro. Colture protette, 19, 81-90.
30. VAN DEN BULK, R. W., LÖFFLER, H. J. M., LINDHOUT, W. H. and KOORNNEEF M., (1990). Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and a comparison with chemical mutagenesis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 80, 817-25.
31. VARGA, A. and BRUINSMA, J. (1976). Roles of seeds and auxines in tomato fruit growth. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie, 80, 95-104.
32. VAROQUAUX, F., BLANVILLAIN, R., DELSENY, M. and GALLOIS, P. (2000). Less is better: new approaches for seedless fruit production. Trends in Biotechnology, 18, 233-42.