Radical retroperitoneal nephrectomy;Radikale retroperitoneale Nephrektomie

Aktuelle Urologie

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-76

  Kassel, P Albers ^b   Heidenreich, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; LABORATORY TEST; METASTASIS; NEPHRECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; SHORT SURVEY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 1642268967     PISSN: 00017868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818400     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Corman JM, Penson DF, Kur K, et al. Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program. BJU International. 2000; 86: 782-9.
2. Heidenreich A, Schrader A, Ohlmann C, Konrad L, Müller-Rau A. Reverse transcriptase PCR assay for G250 to detect circulating tumour cells in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): results of a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2003; 179 (Suppl 2): 708.
3. Hinman Jr F. Atlas of Urologic Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1998: 853-908.
4. Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75: 1236-42.
5. Lerner SE, Hawkins CA, Blute ML, et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. J Urol. 2002; 167: 884-9.