Calibration in metrological approach

Analytical Letters

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 353-376

  Świtaj Zawadka, Anna ^a   Konieczka, Piotr ^a   Przyk, Elzbieta ^a   Namieśnik, Jacek ^a  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Calibrants; Calibration; Traceability; Uncertainty; Validation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DISPERSION; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 16344390940     PISSN: 00032719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/AL-200043431     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Alexandrov, Y.I. 1997. Once More on the Account of Chemical Composition Analysis, Traceability and Calibration in Chemical Analysis (in Response to the Discussion Opened by Werner Hasselbarth). Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 357: 563-571.
2. Barwick, V.J. and Ellison, S.L.R. 1999. Measurement Uncertainty: Approaches to the Evaluation of Uncertainties Associated with Recovery. Analyst, 124: 981-990.
3. Bievre, P. 1999. Do Interlaboratory Comparisons Provide Traceability? Accred. Qual. Assur., 4: 342-346.
4. Bievre, P., Kaarls, R., Peiser, H.S., Rasberry, S.D., and Reed, W.P. 1997. Protocols for Traceability in Chemical Analysis. Part I: Definitions and Terminology. Accred. Qual. Assur., 2: 168-179.
5. Bonate, P.L. 1991. Concepts in Calibration Theory, Part I: Regression. LC-GC, 10 (4): 310-312.
6. Bruggemann, L. and Wennrich, R. 2002. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Analytical Procedures Using a Linear Calibration Function. Accred. Qual. Assur., 7: 269-273.
7. Caroli, S., Forte, G., and Iamiceli, A.L. 1999. ICP-AES and ICP-MS Quantification of Trace Elements in the Marine Macroalga Fucus sample, a New Candidate Certified Reference Material. Microchem. J., 62: 244-250.
8. Caroli, S., Senofonte, O., Caimi, S., Robouch, P., Pauwels, J., and Kramer, G.N. 1988. Certified Reference Materials for Research in Antarctica: the Case of Marine Sediment. Microchem. J., 59: 136-143.
9. Carril, M.P., Corbillon, M.S., and Madariaga, J.M. 1997. Validation of an Analytical Method to Determine Trace Metal Impurities in Fluoride Compounds by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Accred. Qual. Assur., 2: 301-308.
10. Cuadros-Rodrigez, L., Gamiz-Gracia, L., Almansa-Lopez, E., and Laso-Sanchez, J. 2001a. Calibration in Chemical Measurement Processes: I. A Metrological Approach. Trends Anal. Chem., 20 (4): 195-206.
11. Cuadros-Rodriguez, L., Gámiz-Gracia, L., Almansa-López, E., and Laso-Sânchez, J. 2001b. Calibration in Chemical Measurement Processes. II. A Methodological Approach. Trends Anal. Chem., 20: 620-636.
12. DIN 32645. 1994. Nachweis-, Erfassungs- und Bestimmungsgrenze Beuth Verlag GmbH: Mai.
13. Dybczynski, R., Danko, B., and Polkowska-Motrenko, H. 2000. NAA Study on Homogeneity of Reference Materials and their Suitability for Microanalytical Techniques. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 245: 97-104.
14. Dybczyński, R., Danko, B., and Polkowska-Motrenko, H. 2001. Some Difficult Problems Still Existing in the Preparation and Certification of CRMs. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 370: 126-130.
15. Dybczyński, R., Polkowska-Motrenko, H., Samczyński, Z., and Szopa, Z. 1998. Virginia Tobacco Leaves (CTA-VTL-2)-New Polish CRM for Inorganic Trace Analysis Including Microanalysis. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 360: 384-387.
16. EURACHEM/CITAC. 2000. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, EURACHEM/CITAC Guide. Workshop Draft, September 1994.
17. EURACHEM/CITAC. 2000. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. 2nd ed. Final Draft, April.
18. EURACHEM. 1995. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. EURACHEM: London.
19. Faber, K. and Kowalski, B.R. 1997. Improved Estimation of the Limit of Detection in Multivariate Calibration. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 357: 789-795.
20. Falk, H., Geerling, R., Hattendorf, B., Krengel-Rothensee, K., and Schmidt, K.P. 1997. Capabilities and Limits of ICP-MS for Direct Determination of Element Traces in Saline Solutions. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 359: 352-356.
21. Felber, H. 1999. Traceability in Chemical Analysis - What Does it Mean? Chimia, 53: 284-286.
22. Fellin, P. and Otson, R. 1993. A Test Atmosphere Generation System for Particle-Bound PNA: Development and Use for Evaluation of Air Sampling Methods. Chemosphere, 27: 2307-2315.
23. Geib, S. and Einax, J.W. 2001. Comparison of Detection Limits in Environmental Analysis-is it Possible? An Approach on Quality Assurance in the Lower Working Range by Verification. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 370: 673-378.
24. Heydorn, K. and Anglov, T. 2002. Calibration Uncertainty. Accred. Qual. Assur., 7: 153-158.
25. Hubaux, A. and Vos, G. 1970. Decision and Detection Limits for Linear Calibration Curves. Anal. Chem., 42 (8): 849-855.
26. ICH. 1994. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures. 27 October.
27. ISO. 1992. Guide 30. Trends and Definitions Used in Connections with Reference Materials; ISO: Geneva.
28. ISO. 1993. International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM); ISO: Geneva.
29. ISO. 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Vocabulary, ISO 8402. ISO: Geneva.
30. ISO. 1995. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. ISO: Geneva.
31. ISO. 1996. Guide 34. Quality System Guidelines for the Production of Reference Materials; ISO: Geneva.
32. ISO/IEC. 1999, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, ISO/IEC 17025.
33. IUPAC. 1998. Guidelines for Calibration in Analytical Chemistry, Part 1: Fundamentals and Single Component Calibration. IUPAC Recommendation. Pure Appl. Chem., 199870: 993-1014.
34. Kalivas, J.H. and Sutter, J.M. 1991. Generalized Simulated Annealing for Calibration Sample Selection from an Existing Set and Orthogonalization of Undesigned Experiments. J. Chemom., 5: 37-48.
35. King, B. 2001. Meeting the Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability Requirements of ISO/IEC Standard 17025 in Chemical Analysis. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 371: 714-720.
36. Konieczka, P. 1997. Calibration as a Part of Analytical Procedure. Chem. Inż. Ekol., 4: 37-47.
37. Kramer, G.N. and Pauwels, J. 1996. Planning and Certification of View Multielemental Reference Materials for Research in Antarctica. Mikrochim. Acta, 123: 87-93.
38. Krapp, M. and Neidhart, B. 1999. Solid Diluted Calibrants - a New Concept for the Preparation of Standard Solutions. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 364: 15-21.
39. Love, J.T. 2002. Chemical Metrology, Chemistry and the Uncertainty of Chemical Measurements. Accred. Qual. Assur., 7: 95-100.
40. Majcen, N. 2003. A Need for Clearer Terminology and Guidance in the Role of Reference Materials in Method Development and Validation. Accred. Qual. Assur., 8: 108-112.
41. Marschal, A., Andrieux, T., Compagon, P.A., and Fabre, H. 2002. Chemical Metrology - QUID? Accred. Qual. Assur., 7: 42-49.
42. Namieśnik, J. and Górecki, T. 2001. Quality of Analytical Results. Rev. Roum. Chim., 46: 953-962.
43. Namieśnik, J. and Zygmunt, B. 1999. Role of Reference Materials in Analysis of Environmental Pollutants. Sci. Total Environ., 228: 243-257.
44. Namieśnik, J. and Zygmunt, B. 2000. Reference Materials in Environmental Trace Organic Analysis. Accred. Qual. Assur., 5: 191-197.
45. Pauwels, J. and Lamberty, A. 2001. CRMs for the 21st Century: New Demand and Challenges. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 370: 111-114.
46. Pauwels, J., Veen, A., Lamberty, A., and Schimmel, H. 2000. Evaluation of Uncertainty of Reference Materials. Accred. Qual. Assur., 5: 95-99.
47. Paz Carril, M., Soledad Corbillon, M., and Manuel Madariaga, J. 1997. Validation of an Analytical Method to Determine Trace Metal Impurities in Fluoride Compounds by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Accred. Qual. Assur., 2: 301-308.
48. Quevauviller, Ph. and Donard, O.F.X. 2001. Stated References for Ensuring Traceability of Chemical Measurements for Long-term Environmental Monitoring. Trends Anal. Chem., 20: 600-613.
49. Rasberry, S.D. 1998. Reference Materials in the World of Tomorrow. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 360: 277-281.
50. Sutherland, R.A. and Tack, F.M.G. 2002. Determination of Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn in Certified Reference Materials Using the Optimized BCR Sequential Extraction Procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta, 454: 249-257.
51. Thompson, M. 2000. Towards a Unified Model of Errors in Analytical Measurement. Analyst, 125: 2020-2025.
52. Valcarcel, M. and Rios, A. 1997. Is Traceability an Exclusive Property of Analytical Results? An Extended Approach to Traceability in Chemical Analysis. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 359: 473-475.
53. Veen, A.M.H., Linsinger, T., and Pauwels, J. 2001a. Uncertainty Calculations in the Certification of Reference Materials. 2. Homogeneity Study. Accred. Qual. Assur., 6: 26-30.
54. Veen, A.M.H., Linsinger, T.P.J., Lamberty, A., and Pauwels, J. 2001b. Uncertainty Calculations in the Certification of Reference Materials. 3. Stability Study. Accred. Qual. Assur., 6: 257-263.
55. Veen, A.M.H., Linsinger, T.P.J., Schimmel, H., Lamberty, A., and Pauwels, J. 2001c. Uncertainty Calculations in the Certification of Reference Materials. 4. Characterisation and Certification. Accred. Qual. Assur., 6: 290-294.
56. Veen, A.M.H. and Pauwels, J. 2000. Uncertainty Calculations in the Certification of Reference Materials. 1. Principles of Analysis of Variance. Accred. Qual. Assur., 5: 464-469.
57. Vogelsang, J. and Hadrich, J. 1998. Limits of Detection, Identification and Determination: a Statistical Approach for Practitioners. Accred. Qual. Assur., 3: 242-255.
58. Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary. 1970. G. & C. Merriam Co.: Springfield, MA.
59. Williams, A. 1998. Introduction to Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis. Accred. Qual. Assur., 3: 92-94.
60. Williams, A. 2001. Traceability and Uncertainty - a Comparison on Their Application in Chemical and Physical Measurement. Accred. Qual. Assur., 6: 73-75.
61. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1996. Analytical Detection Limit Guidance & Laboratory Guide for Determining Method Detection Limits. Laboratory Certification Program PUBL-TS-056-96.