Exploring values, context and perceptions in contigent valuation studies: The CV Market Stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 257-274

  Philip, Lorna J ^a   MacMillan, Douglas C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; NATURE CONSERVATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 16344386026     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056042000338172     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brown, T., Peterson, G. & Tonn, B. (1995) The values jury to aid natural resource decisions, Land Economics, 71(2), pp. 250-260.
2. Clark, J., Burgess, J. & Harrison, C. M. (2000) "I struggled with this money business": respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation, Ecological Economics, 33, pp. 45-62.
3. Coote, A. & Lenaghan, J. (1997) Citizens Juries: Theory into Practice (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
4. Foster, J. (Ed.) (1997) Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment (London: Routledge).
5. DETR (2001) Guidance on Using Stated Preference Techniques for the Economic Valuation of Non-Market Effects (London: Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions).
6. Garrod, G. D. & Willis, K. G. (1999) Economic Valuation of the Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
7. Hanley, N., Macmillan, D. C., Wright, R. E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D. & Crabtree, J. R. (1998) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), pp. 1-15.
8. Kenyon, W., Hanley, N. & Nevin, C. (2001) Citizen juries as an aid to environmental valuation, Environment and Planning, 19(4), pp. 557-566.
9. McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R., Arvai, J. & Chuenpagdee, R. (2003) Decision structuring to alleviate embedding in environmental valuation, Ecological Economics, 46, pp. 33-46.
10. Macmillan, D. & Duff, E. I. (1998) The non-market benefits and costs of native woodland restoration, Forestry, 71(3), pp. 247-259.
11. Macmillan, D. C., Philip, L., Hanley, N. & Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2002) Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches, Ecological Economics, 43, pp. 49-59.
12. Petty, S. J. (2000) Capercaillie: A Review of Research Needs (Edinburgh: Central Research Unit of the Scottish Executive).
13. Philip, L. J. & Macmillan, D. C. (2003) Public Perceptions of, and Attitudes Towards, the Control of Wild Animal Species in Scotland (Stirling: University of Stirling).
14. Pollicino, M. & Maddison, D. (2002) Valuing the impacts of air pollution on Lincoln Cathedral, in: S. Navrud & R. C. Ready (Eds) Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artefacts, pp.53-67 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
15. Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000) Data management and analysis methods, in: N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 769-802 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
16. Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods For Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (London: Sage).
17. Uist Wader Project (2002) All about Uist hedgehogs, factsheet number 2, July. Available at: http://www./snh.org.uk/pdfs/news/nw-uwpol_pdf, accessed 7 May 2003.
18. Welsh, M. & Poe, G. L. (1998) Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple-bounded discrete choice approach, Journal of Ecological Economics and Management, 34, pp. 219-232.