Ankle block success rate: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients [4]

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 209-210

  Rudkin, Glenda E ^a   Rudkin, Adam K ^a   Dracopoulos, George C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLONIDINE; LIDOCAINE; ROPIVACAINE;

ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOT SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; PERONEUS NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAPHENOUS NERVE; TIBIAL NERVE; TIME MANAGEMENT; TOURNIQUET; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 16344377691     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03027734     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Myerson MS, Ruland CM, Allon SM. Regional anesthesia for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle 1992; 13: 282-8.
2. Provenzano DA, Viscusi ER, Adams SB Jr, Kerner MB, Torjman MC, Abidi NA. Safety and efficacy of the popliteal fossa nerve block when utilized for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 394-9.
3. Singelyn FJ, Gouverneur JM, Gribomont BF. Popliteal sciatic nerve block aided by a nerve stimulator: a reliable technique for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 278-81.
4. McLeod DH, Wong DH, Vaghadia H, Claridge RJ, Merrick PM Lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with ankle block for analgesia following foot surgery. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 765-9.
5. Rudkin GE, Micallef TA. Impediments to the use of ankle block in Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32: 368-71.