Toward a semantic account of that-deletion in English

Linguistics

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 345-382

  Dor, Daniel ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16344376062     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.345     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biber, Douglas (1999). A register perspective on grammar and discourse: variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. Discourse Studies 1(2), 131-150.
2. Bolinger, Dwight (1972). That's That. The Hague: Mouton.
3. Cushing, Steven (1972). The semantics of sentence pronominalization. Foundations of Language 9, 186-208.
4. Erterschik-Shir, Nomi (1977). On the nature of island constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
5. _(1998). The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Farkas, Donka F. (1990). On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory: Papers from the 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Paul Hirschbueler and Konrad Koerner (eds.), 69-104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Giorgi, Alessandra; and Pianesi, Fabio (2000). Sequence of tense phenomena in Italian: a morphosyntactic analysis. Probus 12, 1-32.
8. _; and Pianesi, Fabio (forthcoming). Imperfect dreams: the temporal dependencies of fictional predicates. To appear in Probus.
9. Grimshaw, Jane (1997). Projection, heads and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28(3), 373-422.
10. Gumperz, John; and Levinson, Steven (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hawkins, John (2001). Why are categories adjacent. Journal of Linguistics 37, 1-34.
12. Hooper, Joan. B. (1975). On Assertive Predicates. Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press.
13. Karttunen, Lauri (1978). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
14. Kayne, Richard (1981). ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12(1), 93-133.
15. Kiparsky, Paul; and Kiparsky, Carol (1979). Fact. In Syntactic Argumentation, Donna Jo Napoli and Emily Rando (eds.), 345-369. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Koenig, Jean-Pierre; and Davis, Anthony R. (2001). Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 71-124.
17. Levin, Beth (1993). English Predicate Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Lucy, John (1992). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Pesetsky, David (1998). Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the Best Good Enough, Pilar Barbosa, Fanny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky (eds.), 337-383. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona (1998). Deconstructing the lexicon. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt and Wihelm Geuder (eds.), 65-97. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
21. Rohdenburg, Günter (1996). Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2), 149-182.
22. Searle, John R.; and Vanderveken, Daniel (1985). Foundations of Elocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Snyder, William; and Rothstein, Susan (1992). A note on contraction, case and complementizers. Linguistic Review 9(3), 251-266.
24. Stowell, Tim (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
25. Thompson, Sandra A.; and Mulac, Anthony (1991). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15, 237-251.
26. Underbill, Robert (1988). The discourse conditions for that-deletion. Manuscript, San Diego State University.
27. Zwicky, Arnold (1971). In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2), 223-232.