Introduction: International perspectives on the New Enclavism and the rise of gated communities

Housing Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 177-186

  Atkinson, Rowland ^a   Blandy, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16344371799     PISSN: 02673037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0267303042000331718     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Alexander, G. S. (1994) Conditions of 'voice': passivity, disappointment and democracy in homeowner associations, in: S. E. Barton & C. J. Silverman (Eds) Common Interest Communities: Private Governments and the Public Interest (Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California).
2. Atkinson, R., Blandy, S., Flint, J. & Lister, D. (2004) Gated Communities in England (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
3. Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2004) Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation, Housing Studies, 19 (6), pp. 875-892.
4. Atkinson, R. & Kintrea, K. (2002) A consideration of the implications of area effects for British Housing and regeneration policy, European Journal of Housing Policy, 2, pp. 1-20.
5. Barton, S. & Silverman, C. (1987) Common Interest Homeowners' Associations Management Study (Sacramento: California Department of Real Estate).
6. Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity).
7. Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
8. Blakely, E. & Snyder, M. (1999) Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States (Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
9. Crawford, A. (2003) Contractual governance of deviant behaviour, Journal of Law and Society, 30, pp. 479-505.
10. Gans, H. (1968) People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions (New York: Basic Books).
11. Graham, S. & Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (London: Routledge).
12. Hope, T. (2000) The clubbing of private security: the collective efficacy problem for rich and poor, in: T. Hope (Ed.) Perspectives on Crime Reduction (Aldershot: Ashgate).
13. Linford, J. B. (2001) Planned Community Living: Handbook for California Homeowners Associations (San Clemente, CA: Felde Publications & Programs).
14. Low, S. (2003) Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America (London: Routledge).
15. McKenzie, E. (1994) Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
16. McKenzie, E. (1998) Homeowner associations and California politics: an exploratory analysis, Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp. 52-75.
17. Massey, D. & Denton, N. (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
18. Minton, A. (2002) Building Balanced Communities: The US and the UK Compared (London: RICS).
19. Sanchez, T. W., Lang, R. E., & Dhavale, D. (2003) Security versus status? A first look at the census's gated community data, Journal of Planning Education and Research.
20. Silverman, C. J., Barton, S. E., Hillmer, J. & Ramos, P. (1989) The Effects of California's Residential Real Estate Disclosure Requirements (Sacramento: California Department of Real Estate).
21. Webster, C. (2001) Gated cities of tomorrow, Town Planning Review, 72, pp. 149-170.
22. Webster, C. (2002) Property rights and the public realm: gates, green belts, and Gemeinschaft, Environment and Planning B, 29, pp. 397-412.
23. Webster, C. (2003) The nature of the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 40(13), pp. 2591-2612.
24. Wilson Doenges, G. (2000) An explanation of sense of community and fear of crime in gated communities, Environment and Behaviour, 32, pp. 597-611.