Gated communities: (Ne) Gating community development?

Housing Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 287-301

  Blandy, Sarah ^a   Lister, Diane ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community; Gated community; Leasehold; Legal sanctions; Resident management; Social capital

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; GATED COMMUNITY; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; URBAN SOCIETY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 16344367759     PISSN: 02673037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026730303042000331781     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alexander, G. S. (1994) Conditions of 'voice': passivity, disappointment and democracy in homeowner associations, in: S. E. Barton & C. J. Silverman (Eds) Common Interest Communities: Private Governments and the Public Interest (Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California).
2. Atkins, P. (1993) How the West was won, Journal of Historic Geography 19, p. 3.
3. Atkinson, R., Blandy, S., Flint, J. & Lister, D. (2004) Gated Communities in England, New Horizons research series (London: ODPM).
4. Barton, S. E. & Silverman, C. J. (1987) Common Interest Homeowners' Associations Management Study (Sacramento: California Department of Real Estate).
5. Birchall, J. (1997) The psychology of participation, in: M. Hawtin & C. Cooper (Eds) Housing, Community and Conflict (London: Ashgate).
6. Blakely, E. J. & Snyder, M. G. (1997) Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States (Washington DC; Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
7. Blandy, S., Lister, D., Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2003) Gated Communities: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence, CNR Paper 12. Available at http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk/research/ enrpaperspdf/cnr12pap.pdf.
8. Chavis, D. & Wandersman, A. (1990) Sense of community in the urban environment: a catalyst for participation and community development, American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, pp. 55-81.
9. Cole, I., Gidley, G., Robinson, D. & Smith, Y. (1998) The Impact of Leasehold Reform. Flat Dwellers' Experiences of Leasehold Enfranchisement and Lease Renewal (London: DETR).
10. Cole, I., Hickman, P., Millward, L., Reid, B., Slocombe, L. & Whittle, S. (2000) Tenant Participation in England: A Stocktake of Activity in the Local Authority Sector (Sheffield: Centre for Regional, Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University).
11. DETR (Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000) Indices of Deprivation 2000, Regeneration Research Summary Number 31 (London: DETR).
12. DETR/DSS (Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions/ Department of Social Security) (2000) Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All (London: ODPM).
13. Dickson, J. & Robertson, J. (1993) Taking Charge (London: the London Housing Unit).
14. Foley, M. W. & Edwards, B. (1999) Is it time to disinvest in social capital?, Journal of Public Policy, 19, pp. 141-173.
15. Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 2125-2143.
16. Henning, C. & Lieberg, M. (1996) Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourbood networks in a new perspective, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13, pp. 3-26.
17. Live Strategy (2002) Telephone Survey into attitudes towards gated communities in England, for the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. Unpublished data.
18. McKenzie, E. (1994) Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
19. Mitchell, J. C. (2004) Double Shot Buzz (website entry for 30 April 2002). Available at http://www.coffeebeer.co.uk/doubleshot/ cafe9_toothpaste.html (accessed 3 September 2003).
20. Performance and Innovation Unit (2002) Social Capital: A Discussion Paper. (Available on Cabinet Office website: www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/innovation/2001/futures/attachments/ socialcapital.pdf (accessed 3 September 2003).
21. Rejindorp, A., Kompier, V., Metaal, S., Noi, I. & Truijens, B. (1998) Buitenwijk: Stedelijkheid op afstand (Suburban Neighbourhood Urbanity at a Distance) (Rotterdam: NAI Uitgevers).
22. Rich, M. (2003) Homeowner boards blur line of who rules roost, New York Times, 27 July, p. 1.
23. SEU (Social Exclusion Unit) (2000) National Framework for Neighbourhood Renewal: A Framework for Consultation (London: Cabinet Office).