Preflight virtual reality training as a countermeasure for space motion sickness and disorientation

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 352-356

  Stroud, Kenneth J ^a,b   Harm, Deborah L ^a   Klaus, David M ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Astronaut; Orientation; Spatial disorientation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DISORIENTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FLIGHT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION SICKNESS; NAUSEA; SPACE FLIGHT; SYMPTOM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

NASA CENTER JSC; NASA DISCIPLINE NEUROSCIENCE; NON-NASA CENTER;

ADULT; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SPACE FLIGHT; SPACE MOTION SICKNESS; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WEIGHTLESSNESS SIMULATION;

EID: 16244421123     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bagshaw M, Stott JRR. The desensitization of chronically motion sick aircrew in the Royal Air Force. Aviat Space Environ Med 1985; 56:1144-51.
2. Barrett RJ, Lokhandwala MF. Circulatory and vestibular implications of central angiotensin mechanisms in physiological adaptation to weightlessness. Med Hypotheses 1981; 7:1415-9.
3. Cowings PS. Autogenic-feedback training: a treatment for motion and space sickness. In: Crampton GH, ed. Motion and space sickness. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990; 353-72.
4. Davis JR, Vanderploeg JM, Santy PA, et al. Space motion sickness during 24 flights of the Space Shuttle. Aviat Space Environ Med 1988; 59:1185-9.
5. Harm DL, Reschke MF. Visual-vestibular integration: motion perception reporting. In: Sawin CF, Taylor GR, Smith WL, eds. Extended Duration Orbiter Medical Project. Houston: NASA Johnson Space Center, 1999; 5.2-1 - 5.2-12; NASA/SP-1999-534.
6. Harm DL, Parker DE. Preflight adaptation training for spatial orientation and space motion sickness. J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 34:618-27.
7. Kennedy R, Stanney K, Dunlap W. Duration and exposure to virtual environments: sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2000; 9:463-72.
8. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, et al. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3:203-20.
9. Kennedy RS, Lilienthal MG, Berbaum KS, et al. Simulator sickness in U.S. Navy flight simulators. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:10-6.
10. Kornilova LN, Yakovleva IY, Tarasov IK, et al. Vestibular dysfunction in cosmonauts during adaptation to zero-g and readaptation to 1 g. Physiologist 1983; 26:S35-40.
11. Leone G. The effect of gravity on human recognition of disoriented objects. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1998; 28(1-2):203-14.
12. Matsnev EI, Yakovleva IY, Tarasov IK, et al. Space motion sickness: phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms. Aviat Space Environ Med 1983; 54:312-7.
13. Oman CM, Shebilske WL, Richards JT, et al. Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments. Spat Cogn Comput 2000; 2:355-72.
14. Parker DE, Parker KL. Adaptation to the simulated stimulus rearrangement of weightlessness. In: Crampton GH, ed. Motion and space sickness. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1990:247-62.
15. Parker DE, Reschke MF, Arrott AP, et al. Otolith tilt translation reinterpretation following prolonged weightlessness: implications for preflight training. Aviat Space Environ Med 1985; 56:601-7.
16. Parker DE, Tjemstrom O, Ivarsson A, et al. Physiological and behavioral effects of tilt-induced body fluid shifts. Aviat Space Environ Med 1983; 54:402-9.
17. Reason JT, Brand JJ. Motion sickness. London: Academic Press, 1975.
18. rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994:228-60.
19. rd ed. Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999:169-75.
20. Schmidt RA. The schema theory as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In: Stelmach GE, ed. Motor control: issues and trends. New York: Academic Press; 1976: 41-65.
21. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 1975; 82:225-60.
22. Shea CH, Shebilske WL, Worchel S. Practice scheduling and composition. In: Motor learning and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1993: 233-59.
23. Shea CH, Kohl RM. Specificity and variability of practice. Res Q Exerc Sport 1990; 61(2):169-177.
24. Stott JRR. Adaptation to nauseogenic motion stimuli and its application in the treatment of airsickness. In: Crampton G.H. Motion and Space Sickness. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1990.
25. Stroud KJ, Klaus DM, Harm DL. Applications of vestibular system response to mission risk mitigation factors and spacecraft design requirements. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2003; SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2535.
26. Treisman M. Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 1977; 197:493-5.
27. nd International Conference on Space Physiology; Toulouse, France, 1985. Paris: European Space Agency, 1986; ESA SP-237:137-42.
28. von Baumgarten RJ, Wetzig J, Vogel H, et al. Static and dynamic mechanisms of space vestibular malaise. Physiologist 1982; 25:S33-6.