Enhancing specificity in proxy-design for the assessment of bioenergetics

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-204

  Flouris, A D ^a   Koutedakis, Y ^b,c   Nevill, A ^b   Metsios, G S ^b   Tsiotra, G ^b   Parasiris, Y ^c  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOENERGY; BODY MASS; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREADMILL EXERCISE; VOLUNTEER; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE TEST; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RUNNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPORTS MEDICINE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE TEST; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REFERENCE VALUES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RUNNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPORTS MEDICINE;

EID: 16244418095     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80009-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, et al. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 1988;6:93-101.
2. Shephard RJ, Bailey DA, & Mirwald RL. Development of the Canadian Home Fitness Test. Can Med Assoc J 1976;114:675-9.
3. Shephard RJ. Tests of maximum oxygen intake. A critical review. Sports Med 1984;1:99-124.
4. McNaughton L, Cooley PDC, Kearney V, et al. A comparison of two different Shuttle Run tests for the estimation of VO2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1996;36:85-89.
5. McNaughton L, Hall P, & Cooley D. Validation of several methods of estimating maximal oxygen uptake in young men. Percept Mot Skills 1998;87:575-84.
6. Léger L, & Gadoury C. Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with l min stages to predict VO2max in adults. Can J Sports Sci 1989;14:21-26.
7. Berthoin S, Gerbeaux M, Turpin E, et al. Comparison of two field tests to estimate maximum aerobic speed. J Sports Sci 1994;12:355-62.
8. Grant S, Corbett K, Amjad AM, et al. A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 1995;29:147-152.
9. Besier TF, Lloyd DG, & Ackland TR. Muscle activation strategies at the knee during running and cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:119-27.
10. Strømme SB, Ingjer F, & Meen HD. Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 1977;42:833-877.
11. Koutedakis Y, Boreham C, Kabitsis C, et al. Seasonal deterioration of selected physiological variables in elite male skiers. Int J Sports Med 1992;13:548-551.
12. Roecker K, Schotte O, Niess MA, et al. Predicting competition performance in long-distance running by means of a treadmill test. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:1552-1557.
13. Bland JM. & Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8:307-310.
14. Nevill AM, & Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997;31:314-318.
15. Basset FA, & Boulay MR. Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners, and cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000;81:214-221.
16. Verstappen FT, Huppertz RM, & Snoeckx LH. Effect of training specificity on maximal treadmill and bicycle ergometer exercise. Int J Sports Med 1982;3:43-46.
17. Anderson GS. A comparison of predictive tests of aerobic capacity. Can J Sports Sci 1992;17:304-308.
18. Ahmaidi S, Collomp K, & Prefaut C. The effect of shuttle test protocol and the resulting lactacidaemia on maximal velocity and maximal oxygen uptake during the shuttle exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:475-479.
19. Sproule J, Kunalan C, McNeill M, et al. Validity of 20-MST for predicting VO2max of adult Singaporean athletes. Br J Sports Med 1993;27:202-204.
20. Ahmaidi S, Collomp K, Caillaud C, et al. Maximal and functional aerobic capacity as assessed by two graduated field methods in comparison to laboratory exercise testing in moderately trained subjects. Int J Sports Med 1992;13:243-248. 205-215