Generating multiple noise elimination filters with the ensemble- partitioning filter

Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, IRI-2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 369-375

  Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M ^a,b   Rebours, Pierre ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Florida Atlantic Univ   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification filter; Data noise; Ensemble filter; Partitioning filter; Quality of data; Software measurement; Softwarwe faults

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA MINING; DATA REDUCTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

CLASSIFICATION FILTERS; DATA NOISE; ENSEMBLE FILTER; PARTITIONING FILTERS; QUALITY OF DATA; SOFTWARE FAULTS; SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT;

SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

EID: 16244415234     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. C. G. Atkeson, A. W. Moore, and S. Schaal. Locally weighted learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(1-5):11-73, 1997.
2. C. E. Brodley and M. A. Friedl. Identifying mislabeled training data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:131-167, 1999.
3. th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115-123, Tahoe City, CA, July 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.
4. nd edition, 1997.
5. th International Workshop volume 1160, pages 199-212, Sydney, Australia, October 1996. Springer-Verlag.
6. R. C. Holte. Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning, 11:63-91, 1993.
7. th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pages 226-231, Banff, Alberta, Canada, June 2004.
8. T. M. Khoshgoftaar and N. Seliya. Analogy-based practical classification rules for software quality estimation. Empirical Software Engineering Journal, 8(4):325-350, December 2003.
9. T. M. Khoshgoftaar and N. Seliya. The necessity of assuring quality in software measurement data. In Proceedings of 10th International Software Metrics Symposium, pages 119-130, Chicago, IL, September 2004.
10. J. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
11. K. C. Laudon. Data quality and the due process in large interorganizational record systems. Communications of the ACM, 29(1):4-11, 1986.
12. J. R. Quinlan. C4-5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
13. P. Rebours. Partitioning filter approach to noise elimination: An empirical study in software quality classification. Master's thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, April 2004. Advised by T. M. Khoshgoftaar.
14. C. M. Teng. A comparison of noise handling techniques. In Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, pages 269-273, 2001.
15. I. H. Whitten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with JAVA Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2000.
16. th International Conference on Machine Learning, Washington, DC, 2003.