A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: Surgical complications and clinical outcomes [1]

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 581-583

  Esdaile, Ben A ^c   Chalian, Raffi A ^c   Del Priore, Giuseppe ^c   Smith, J Richard ^c   Rieger, Lorenz ^a   Died, Johannes ^a   Learman, Lee A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SUPRACERVICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS DISEASE; UTERUS SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; UTERUS CANCER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MALE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; MALE; SEX FACTORS; UTERINE DISEASES;

EID: 16244411937     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113615.48210.3d     Document Type: Letter

References (0)