메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 807-810

The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation

Author keywords

Patients' preferences; Randomisation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LITERATURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 16244407343     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602445     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (16)

References (10)
  • 1
    • 0029760259 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Offering patients entry in clinical trials: Preliminary study of the views of prospective participants
    • Corbett F, Oldham J, Lilford R (1996) Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants. J Med Ethics 22: 227-231
    • (1996) J Med Ethics , vol.22 , pp. 227-231
    • Corbett, F.1    Oldham, J.2    Lilford, R.3
  • 2
    • 2442582304 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Communicating evidence for participatory decision making
    • Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE (2004) Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA 291: 2359-2366
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , pp. 2359-2366
    • Epstein, R.M.1    Alper, B.S.2    Quill, T.E.3
  • 3
    • 0032585195 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial
    • Featherstone K, Donovan JL (1998) Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 317: 1177-1180
    • (1998) Br Med J , vol.317 , pp. 1177-1180
    • Featherstone, K.1    Donovan, J.L.2
  • 4
    • 0036302082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 'Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?' The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial
    • Featherstone K, Donovan JL (2002) 'Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?' The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med 55: 709-719
    • (2002) Soc Sci Med , vol.55 , pp. 709-719
    • Featherstone, K.1    Donovan, J.L.2
  • 5
    • 0035119827 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Results of an intervention study to improve communication about randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy
    • Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Fallowfield L (2001) Results of an intervention study to improve communication about randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 37: 322-331
    • (2001) Eur J Cancer , vol.37 , pp. 322-331
    • Fleissig, A.1    Jenkins, V.2    Fallowfield, L.3
  • 6
    • 19744383730 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: Evaluation of a cancer research UK training programme
    • in press
    • Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, SolisTrapala I, Langridge C, Farewell V (2005) Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a cancer research UK training programme. Br Med J (in press)
    • (2005) Br Med J
    • Jenkins, V.1    Fallowfield, L.2    SolisTrapala, I.3    Langridge, C.4    Farewell, V.5
  • 7
    • 0037037334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Describing randomisation: Patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' practices
    • Jenkins V, Leach L, Fallowfield L, Nicholls K, Newsham A (2002) Describing randomisation: Patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' practices. Br J Cancer 87: 854-858
    • (2002) Br J Cancer , vol.87 , pp. 854-858
    • Jenkins, V.1    Leach, L.2    Fallowfield, L.3    Nicholls, K.4    Newsham, A.5
  • 8
    • 1342287924 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomisation in trials: Do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
    • Kerr C, Robinson E, Stevens A, Braunholtz D, Edwards S, Lilford R (2004) Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable? J Med Ethics 30: 80-84
    • (2004) J Med Ethics , vol.30 , pp. 80-84
    • Kerr, C.1    Robinson, E.2    Stevens, A.3    Braunholtz, D.4    Edwards, S.5    Lilford, R.6
  • 9
    • 0346367055 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials
    • Robinson EJ, Kerr C, Stevens A, Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Edwards S (2004) Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 58: 811-824
    • (2004) Soc Sci Med , vol.58 , pp. 811-824
    • Robinson, E.J.1    Kerr, C.2    Stevens, A.3    Lilford, R.4    Braunholtz, D.5    Edwards, S.6
  • 10
    • 4344596053 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology
    • Simon CM, Siminoff LA, Kodish ED, Burant C (2004) Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology. J Clin Oncol 22: 2708-2717
    • (2004) J Clin Oncol , vol.22 , pp. 2708-2717
    • Simon, C.M.1    Siminoff, L.A.2    Kodish, E.D.3    Burant, C.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.