Surface reconstruction from the projection of points, curves and contours

Proceedings - 2nd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission. 3DPVT 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 301-307

  Solem, Jan Erik ^a   Kahl, Fredrik ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REAL-VALUED FUNCTIONS; STATISTICAL MODELS; SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION;

CAMERAS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 16244396445     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/TDPVT.2004.1335214     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In SIGGRAPH, pages 187-194, 1999.
2. A. Bottino and A. Laurentini. Introducing a new problem: Shape-from-silhouette when the relative positions of the viewpoints is unknown. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(11):1484-1493, 2003.
3. E. Boyer and M.-O. Berger. 3d surface reconstruction using occluding contours. Int. Journal Computer Vision, 22(3):219-233, 1997.
4. R. Cipolla and A. Blake. Surface shape from the deformation of apparent contours. Int. Journal Computer Vision, 9(2):83-112, 1992.
5. T. F. Cootes and Taylor C. J. Active shape model search using local grey-level models: A quantatitative evaluation. In British Machine Vision Conf., pages 639-648, 1993.
6. T.F. Cootes, G.V. Wheeler, K.N. Walker, and C.J. Taylor. View-based active appearance models. Image and Vision Computing, 20(9-10):657-664, 2002.
7. R.H. Davies, C.J. Twining, T.F. Cootes, J.C. Waterton, and C.J. Taylor. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 21(5):525-537, 2002.
8. O. Faugeras and R. Keriven. Variational principles, surface evolution, pdes, level set methods, and the stereo problem. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(3):336-344, 1998.
9. P. J. Giblin and R. Weiss. Reconstruction of surfaces from profiles. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 136-144, London, UK, 1987.
10. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
11. H. Jin, S. Soatto, and A.J. Yezzi. Multi-view stereo beyond lambert. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, Wisconsin, 2003.
12. T. Joshi, N. Ahuja, and I. Ponce. Structure and motion estimates from dynamic silhouettes under perspective projection. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 290-295, Cambridge Ma, USA, 1995.
13. F. Kahl and J.E. Solem. Reconstructing surface models using level sets and statistical shape models. Technical report, 2004.
14. M. Lhuillier and L. Quan. Surface reconstruction by integrating 3d and 2d data of multiple views. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 1313-1320, Nice, France, 2003.
15. W.E. Lorensen and H.E. Cline. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface reconstruction algorithm. Computer Graphics (Siggraph'87), 21(4):163-169, 1987.
16. P. R. S. Mendonca and R. Cipolla. Estimation of epipolar geometry from apparent contours: Affine and circular motion cases. In Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume I, pages 9-14, Fort Collins, USA, 1999.
17. S. Osher and J. A. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79:12-49, 1988.
18. S. J. Osher and R. P. Fedkiw. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer Verlag, 2002.
19. S. Romdhani and T. Vetter. Efficient, robust and accurate fitting of a 3d morphable model. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 59-66, Nice, France, 2003.
20. J.A. Sethian. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
21. J.E. Solem and A. Heyden. Reconstructing open surfaces from unorganized data points. In International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Washington DC, 2004.
22. J.E. Solem, H. Aanæs, and A. Heyden. A variational analysis of shape from specularities using sparse data. In 2nd Int. Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2004.
23. R. Szeliski and R. Weiss. Robust shape recovery from occluding contours using a linear smoother. In T. Terzopoulis and C.M. Brown, editors, Real-Time Vision. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
24. M. E. Tipping and C. M. Bishop. Probabilistic principal component analysis. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B, 61(3):611-622, 1999.
25. R. Vaillant and O. D. Faugeras. Using extremal boundaries for 3D object modelling. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2):157-173, 1992.
26. H.K. Zhao, S. Osher, B. Merriman, and M. Kang. Implicit and non-parametric shape reconstruction from unorganized points using a variational level set method. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding, pages 295-319, 2000.