Melissa Rowland and the rights of pregnant women

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1234-1236

  Minkoff, Howard ^a   Paltrow, Lynn M ^b  

^a MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT RIGHT; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STILLBIRTH; TREATMENT REFUSAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FETUS DEATH; HISTORY; LEGAL ASPECT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; ETHICS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HOMICIDE; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UTAH;

EID: 16244392095     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146289.65429.48     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethical dimensions of informed consent. ACOG Committee Opinion 108. Washington, DC: ACOG; 1992.
2. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1994.
3. Kolder V, Gallagher J, Parsons M. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1192-6.
4. Gallagher J. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights. Harvard Womens Law J 1987;10:9-10.
5. Annas GJ. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1213-4.