Looking into the institutional review board: Observations from both sides of the table

Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 921-924

  Burke, Georgine S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Human subjects; IRB; Research protection

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; EXPERIENCE; GEOGRAPHY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OBSERVATION; PROPHYLAXIS; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 16244385000     PISSN: 00223166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jn/135.4.921     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Tarnowski, K. J., Allen, D. M., Mayhall, C. & Kelly, P. A. (1990) Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics 85: 58-62.
2. Harth, S. C., Johnstone, R. R. & Thong, Y. H. (1992) The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. J. Med. Ethics 18: 86-93.
3. Kodish, E. D., Pentz, R. D., Noll, R. B., Ruccione, K., Buckley, J. & Lange, B. J. (1998) Informed consent in the Childrens Cancer Group: results of preliminary research. Cancer 82: 2467-2481.
4. Lilleyman, J. S. (1995) Informed consent: how informed and consent to what [editorial]? Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 12: xiii-xvi.
5. Koren, G., Carmeli, D. B., Carmeli, Y. S. & Haslam, R. (1993) Maturity of children to consent to medical research: the babysitter test. J. Med. Ethics 19: 142-147.
6. Harth, S. C. & Thong, Y. H. (1995) Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children. Soc. Sci. Med. 40: 1573-1577.
7. Bamberg, M. & Budwig, N. (1992) Therapeutic misconceptions10/1/2000: when the voices of caring and research are misconstrued as the voice of curing. Ethics Behav. 2: 165-184.
8. Pokorny, S. B., Jason, L A., Schoeny, M. E., Townsend, S. M. & Currie, C. J. (2001) Do participation rates change when active consent procedures replace passive consent. Eval. Rev. 25: 567-580.
9. Kodish, E., Eder, M., Noll, R. B., Ruccione, K., Lange, B., Angiolillo, A., Pentz, R., Zyzanski, S. & Siminoff, L. A. (2004) Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 291: 470-475.
10. Alderson, P. & Goodey, C. (1998) Theories in health care and research: theories of consent. Br. Med. J. 317: 1313-1315.
11. Raich, P. C., Plomer, K. D. & Coyne, C. A. (2001) Literacy, comprehension and informed consent in clinical research. Cancer Invest. 19: 437-445.
12. Oakes, J. M. (2002) Risks and wrongs in social science research: an evaluator's guide to the IRB. Eval. Rev. 26: 443-479.
13. Katz, G. J. (1982) Inconsistency and institutional review boards. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 248: 197-202.
14. White, M. T. & Gamm, J. (2002) Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices. Account Res. 9: 1-16.
15. Shah, S., Whittle, A., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G. & Wendler, D. (2004) How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 291: 476-482.
16. Lux, A. L., Edwards, S. W. & Osborne, J. P. (2000) Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee. Br. Med. J. 320: 1182-1183.
17. Levine, R. J. (1988) The Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
18. Amdur, R. (2003) The Institutional Review Board Member Handbook. Jones and Barlett, Sudbury, MA.
19. Abramovitch, R., Freedman, J. L., Henry, K. & Van Brunschot, M. (1995) Children's capacity to agree to psychological research: knowledge of risks and benefits and voluntariness. Ethics Behav. 5: 25-48.
20. Hayes, G. J., Hayes, S. C. & Dykstra, T. (1995) A survey of university institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures. IRB 17: 1-6.
21. De Vries, R. G. & Forsbert, C. P. (2002) What do IRBs look like: what kind of support do they receive? Account Res. 9: 1999-1216.
22. Fisher, C. B. (1997) A relational perspective on ethics-in-science: decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations. IRB 19: 1-4.
23. Thompson, R. A. (1990) Vulnerability in research: a developmental perspective on research risk. Child Dev. 61: 1-16.
24. Mammel, K. A. & Kaplan, D. W. (1995) Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards. J. Adolesc. Health 17: 323-330.
25. Brooks-Gunn, J. & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (1994) Rights to privacy in research: adolescents versus parents. Ethics Behav. 4: 109-121.
26. Director, Division of Human Subject Protections, Office for the Protection of Research Risk (OPRR). (1998, updated 2000) IRB Knowledge of Local Research Context, pp. 1-5. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
27. White, M. T. (1999) Guidelines for IRB review of international collaborative medical research: a proposal. J. Law Med. Ethics 27: 87-94.
28. Guiliano, A. R., Mokuau, N., Hughes, C., Tortolero-Luna, G., Risendal, B., Ho, R.C.S., Prewitt, T. E. & McCaskill-Stevens, W. J. (2000) Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural and linguistic factors. Ann. Epidemiol. 10: S22-34.
29. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc. (AAHRPP). (2004) AAHRPP Accreditation Standards. AAHRPP, Inc., Washington, DC.
30. Kass, N. E., Sugarman, J., Faden, R. & Schoch-Spana, M. (1996) Trust, the Fragile Foundation of Contemporary Biomedical Research. Hastings Cent Rep #26. The Hastings Center, Garrison, NY.