Governmentality and the war on terror: FBI project carnivore and the diffusion of disciplinary power

Critical Criminology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 55-70

  Ventura, Holly E ^a   Miller, J Mitchell ^a   Deflem, Mathieu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244380472     PISSN: 12058629     EISSN: 15729877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10612-004-6167-6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. American Civil Liberties Union (2002). Insatiable Appetite: The Government's Demand for New and Unnecessary Powers After September 11. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Civil Liberties Union (2003). The ACLU in the Courts Since 9/11. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Baddeley, S. (1997). Govemmentality. In B.D. Loader (ed.), The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring. London: Routledge, pp. 64-96.
4. Birdis, T. (2001). Justice Department asks Congress to clear wide-ranging antiterrorism legislation. The Wall Street Journal (September 19), A4.
5. Black, D. (1976). The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.
6. Black, D. (1993). The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. New York: Academic Press.
7. Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Collingwood, J.E. (2000a). Editorial Responses, 24 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
9. Collingwood, J.E. (2000b). Editorial Responses, 25 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
10. Collingwood, J.E. (2000c). Editorial Responses, 7 August. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
11. Deflem, M. (1997). Surveillance and criminal statistics: Historical foundations of governmentality. In A. Sarat and S. Silbey (eds.), Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. 17. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 149-184.
12. Deflem, M. (ed.) (2004). Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, Vol. 5. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
13. Dunham, G.S. (2002). Carnivore, the FBI's e-mail surveillance system: Devouring criminals, not privacy. Federal Communications Law Journal 54, 543-566.
14. Eggen, D. (2002a). Carnivore glitches blamed for FBI woes. Washington Post (May 29), A7.
15. Eggen, D. (2002b). FBI misused wiretaps, according to memo. Washington Post (October 10), A14.
16. Electronic Frontier Foundation (2000). "The Fourth Amendment and Carnivore." Statement of The Electronic Frontier Foundation Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary. United States House of Representatives, July 28, 2000. Available Online: www.eef.org
17. Electronic Frontier Foundation (2003). "Chilling Effects of Anti-Terrorism". Available Online: www.eef.org
18. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000a). "Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 7/24/00". Available online: www.fbi.gov
19. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000b). "Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 9/6/00". Available online: www.fbi.gov
20. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2003). "Carnivore Diagnostic Tool". Available online: www.fbi.gov
21. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
22. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
23. Foucault, M. (1981). 'Omnes et Singulatim'. Towards a criticism of Political reason'. In S. M. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 223-254.
24. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87-104.
25. Garland, D. (1997). 'Governmentality' and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology 1(2), 173-214.
26. Gilman, J. (2001). Carnivore: The uneasy relationship between the Fourth Amendment and electronic surveillance of internet communications. CommLaw Conspectus 9, 111-129.
27. Gooldstein, G. and Orr, C.H. (2003). Application of the U.S.A. Patriot Act to criminal investigations violates the First and Fourth Amendments. Texas Bar Journal 66(2), 40-52.
28. Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-51.
29. Gugliotta, G. and Krim, J. (2001). Push for increased surveillance worries some. Washington Post (September 25), A4.
30. Haas, T.C. (2001). Carnivore and the Fourth Amendment. Connecticut Law Review 34, 261-291.
31. Holmes, P.K. (2001). FBI's Carnivore: Is the government eating away our right of privacy? Roger Williams University Law Review 7, 247-272.
32. IIT Research Institute (2000). Evaluation of Carnivore Diagnostic Tool. Chicago: Author.
33. Jackman, T. (2003). Judges uphpld US detention of Hamdi. Washington Post (January 9), AI.
34. Lerner, C.S. (2003). The reasonableness of probable cause. Texas Law Review 81(4), 951-1029.
35. Marx, G.T. (1988). Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36. Marx, G.T. (1998). An ethics for the new surveillance. The Information Society 14(3), 171-185.
37. Marx, G.T. (1999). Measuring everything that moves: The new surveillance at work. In I. Simpson and R. Simpson (eds.), The Workplace and Deviance. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 165-189.
38. Marx, G.T. (2002). Technology and social control. In N. Smelser and P. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, pp. 15506-15511.
39. Merl, S.R. (2001). Internet communication standards for the 21st century: International terrorism must force the U.S. to adopt 'Carnivore' and new electronic surveillance standards. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 27, 245-284.
40. Merton, R.K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1(6), 894-904.
41. O'Harrow, R. (2001). FBI's Carnivore might target wireless text. Washington Post (August 24), E1.
42. Rosen, J. (2002). Liberty wins: So far Bush runs into checks and balances in demanding new powers. Washington Post (September 15), B1.
43. Scheeres, J. (2001). "Suppression Stifles Some Sites". Available online: www.wired.com.
44. Stanley, J. and Steinhardt, B. (2003). Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The Growth of an American Surveillance Society. New York: ACLU.
45. StopCarnivoreNow (2003). "The Backdoor, the Rogue Agent, and the Mishap: The Hidden Dangers of Carnivore". Available online: www.stopcarnivore.org
46. Strauss, A.Y. (2002). A constitutional crisis in the digital age: Why the FBI's 'Carnivore' does not defy the Fourth Amendment. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 20, 231-258.
47. Tountas, S. W. (2003). Carnivore: Is the regulation of wireless technology a legally viable option to curtail the growth of cybercrime? Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 11, 351-377.
48. Tyson, J. (2003) "How Carnivore Works". Available online: www.howthingswork.com United States v. Katz (1967). 389 U.S. 347.
49. Vlahos, KB. (2001). "FBI Seeking to Wiretap Internet". Available online: www.foxnews.com
50. Voors, M.P. (2003). Encryption regulation in the wake of September 11, 2001 Must we protect national security at the expense of the economy? Federal Communications Law Journal 55(22), 331-350.
51. Walters, R. (2003). New modes of governance and the commodification of criminological knowledge. Social and Legal Studies 12(1), 5-26.