Context learning can improve user interaction

Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, IRI-2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 115-120

  Louis, Sushil J ^a   Shankar, Anil ^a  

^a Reno   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); CONTEXT LEARNING; CURRENT SENSORS; USER INTERACTION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; DATA REDUCTION; FEEDBACK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; SENSORS; USER INTERFACES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 16244375582     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Motion, http://motion.sourceforge.net/.
2. P. D. Adamczyk and B. P. Bailey. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 271-278, 2004.
3. A. Black, P. Taylor, and R. Caley. The festival speech synthesis system. 1998.
4. C.M.U. Sphinx: Open source speech recognition. http://www.speech.cs.cmu. edu/sphinx/.
5. A. K. Dey, G. D. Abowd, and D. Salber. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware appplications. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 2001.
6. J. Fogarty, S. E. Hudson, and J. Lai. Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 207-214, 2004.
7. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 1998.
8. D. E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.
9. E. Horvitz and J. Apacible. Learning and reasoning about interruption. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, pages 20-27, 2003.
10. S. Hudson, J. Fogarty, C. Atkeson, J. Forlizzi, S. Kiesler, J. Lee, and J. Yang. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: A wizard of oz feasibility study. Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Press, 2003.
11. A. Kulkarni. A reactive behavioral system for the intelligent room. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2002., 2002.
12. J. R. Quinlan. C4-5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
13. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA, 2000.