Comparative histological and immunohistochemical study of sea star tube feet (Echinodermata, Asteroidea)

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 263, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 259-269

  Santos, Romana ^a   Haesaerts, Delphine ^b   Jangoux, Michel ^a,b   Flammang, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Antibody cross reactivity; Asteroidea; Functional morphology; Podia; Temporary adhesion

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LIMB; STARFISH;

ANIMALS; EXTREMITIES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; STARFISH;

ASTERIAS; ASTERIAS RUBENS; ASTEROIDEA; ECHINODERMATA;

EID: 16244368508     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10187     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blake DB. 1989. Asteroidea: functional morphology, classification and phylogeny. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM, editors. Echinoderm studies, vol. 3. Rotterdam: Balkema. p 179-223.
2. Blake DB. 1990. Adaptive zones of the class Asteroidea (Echinodermata). Bull Mar Sci 46:701-718.
3. Chaet AB. 1965. Invertebrates adhering surfaces: secretions of the starfish, Asterias forbesi and the coelenterate, Hydra pirardi. Ann NY Acad Sci 118:921-929.
4. Chaet AB, Philpott DE. 1964. A new subcellular particle secreted by the starfish. J Ultrastruct Res 11:354-362.
5. Clark AM, Downey ME. 1992. Starfishes of the Atlantic. London: Chapman & Hall.
6. Engster MS, Brown SC. 1972. Histology and ultrastructure of the tube foot epithelium in the phanerozonian starfish, Astropecten. Tissue Cell 4:503-518.
7. Flammang P. 1995. Fine structure of the podia in three species of paxillosid asteroids of the genus Luidia (Echinodermata). Belg J Zool 125:125-134.
8. Flammang P. 1996. Adhesion in echinoderms. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM, editors. Echinoderms studies, vol. 5. Rotterdam: Balkema. p 1-60.
9. Flammang P, De Ridder C, Jangoux M. 1990. Morphologie fonctionnelle des podia pénicillés chez l'échinide fouisseur Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata). In: De Ridder C, Dubois P, Lahaye MC, Jangoux M, editors. Echinoderm research. Rotterdam: Balkema. p 233-238.
10. Flammang P, Demeulenaere S, Jangoux M. 1994. The role of podial secretions in adhesion in two species of sea stars (Echinodermata). Biol Bull 187:35-47.
11. Flammang P, Cauwenberge A, Alexandre H, Jangoux M. 1998. A study of the temporary adhesion of the podia in the sea star Asterias rubens (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) through their footprints. J Exp Biol 201:2383-2395.
12. Gabe M. 1968. Techniques histologiques. Paris: Masson.
13. Gibson R, Hextall B, Rogers A. 2001. Photographic guide to the sea and shore life of Britain and north-west Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gosliner TM, Behrens DW, Williams GC. 1996. Coral reef animals of the Indo-Pacific. Monterey: Sea Challengers.
15. Harrison G, Philpott D. 1966. Subcellular particles in echinoderm tube feet. I. Class Asteroidea. J Ultrastruct Res 16:537-547.
16. Hayat MA. 2000. Principles and techniques of electron microscopy. Biological applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Heddle D. 1967. Versatility of movement and the origin of the asteroids. Symp Zool Soc Lond 20:125-141.
18. Hermans CO. 1983. The duo-gland adhesive system. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 21:281-339.
19. Hyman LH. 1955. The invertebrates, vol. 4. Echinodermata. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Jangoux M. 1986. Les Astérides. In: Guille A, Laboute P, Menou JL, editors. Guioe des étoiles de mer, oursins et autres échinodermes du lagon de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Paris: Editions de l'ORSTOM. p 111-153.
21. Lawrence J. 1987. A functional biology of echinoderms. London: Croom Helm.
22. Moore SJ, Thorndyke MC. 1993. Immunocytochemical mapping of the novel echinoderm neuropeptide SALMFamide 1 (S1) in the starfish Asterias rubens. Cell Tissue Res 274:605-618.
23. Newman SJ, Elphick MR, Thorndyke MC. 1995. Tissue distribution of the SALMFamide neuropeptides S1 and S2 in the starfish Asterias rubens using novel monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. II. Digestive system. Proc R Soc Lond B261:187-192.
24. Nichols D. 1966. Functional morphology of the water vascular system. In: Boolootian RA, editor. Physiology of Echinodermata. New York: Interscience Publishers. p 219-244.
25. Picton BE. 1993. A field guide to the shallow-water echinoderms of the British Isles. London: Immel.
26. Romanes GJ, Ewart JC. 1881. Observations on the locomotor system of Echinodermata. Philos Trans R Soc 3:829-885.
27. Smith JE. 1937. The structure and function of the tube feet in certain echinoderms. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 22:345-357.
28. Souza Santos H, Silva Sasso W. 1968. Morphological and histochemical studies on the secretory glands of starfish tube feet. Acta Anat 69:41-51.
29. Thomas L, Hermans CO. 1985. Adhesive interactions between the tube feet of a starfish, Leptasterias hexactis, and the substrata. Biol Bull 169:675-688.
30. Vickery MS, McClintock JB. 2000. Comparative morphology of tube feet among the Asteroidea: phylogenetic implications. Am Zool 40:355-364.