A randomized comparison between rotational and standard coronary angiography

Minerva Cardioangiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-6

  Rigattieri, S ^a   Ghini, A S ^a   Silvestri, P ^a   Tommasino, A ^a   Ferraiuolo, G ^a   Palamara, A ^a   Loschiavo, P ^a  

^a SANDRO PERTINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary disease; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

AGED; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 16244365803     PISSN: 00264725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ammann P, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Angehrn W, Roelli H, Sagmeister M, Rickli H. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator's experience and the catheter size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:13-8.
2. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemie heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-42.
3. Campeau L, Saltiel J. Rotational cineangiocardiography. AJR Radium Ther Nucl Med 1964;41:544-9.
4. Holff DJ, Wallace MC, terBrugge KG, Gentili F. Rotational angiography assessment of cerebral aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1945-8.
5. Tommasini G, Camerini A, Gatti A, Derchi G, Bruzzone A, Vecchio C. Panoramic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:871-7.
6. Raman SV, Morford R, Neff M, Attar TT, Kukielka G, Magorien RD et al. Rotational X-ray coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:201-7.
7. Miller SW. Coronary artery disease. In: Miller SW editors. Cardiac Angiography. Boston: Little, Brown; 1984. p.87.
8. Gami AS, Garovic VD. Contrast nephropathy after coronay angiography. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:211-9.
9. Gaudio C, Mirabelli F, Di Michele S, Nguyen BL, Alessandrà L, Francone M et al. Multidetector computer tomography of the coronary arteries. Ital Heart J 2004;5:423-30.
10. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, Budde T et al. A radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003;226:145-52.
11. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;10:664-6.
12. Kuon E, Niederst PN, Dahm, JB. Usefulness of rotational spin for coronary angiography in patients with advanced renal insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 2002;90: 369-73.
13. Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:167-74.
14. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:349-56.