The ramifications of perspective: How theory focuses research, data, and practice

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 93-100

  Morse, Janice M ^a,b  

^a Faculty of Nursing   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Incontinence; Nursing research; Nursing theory; Research outcomes

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; THEORY;

EID: 15944419506     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00152192-200503000-00006     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Laurence M. The Stone Angel. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart; 1966.
2. Hay-Smith EJK, Berghmans LCM., Hendricks HJM, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. The Cochrane Library 2003; 2 (CD001407).
3. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1970.
4. Keesing RM. Cultural Anthropology: Contemporary Perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1976.
5. Carlson CC. Behavioral Concepts and Nursing Interventions. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1970.
6. Nursing Development Conference Group. Concept Formalization in Nursing: Processes and Product. Boston: Little Brown & Co; 1973.
7. Roy C. Introduction to Nursing: An Adaptation Model. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
8. Rogers ME. An Introduction to the Theoretical Basis of Nursing. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1977.
9. Orem DE. Nursing: Concepts of Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
10. Burton A. The nature of personality theory. In: Burton A. Ed. Operational Theories of Personality. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1974:1-19.
11. Denzin N. Strategies of multiple triangulation. In: N. Denzin. Ed. The Research Act. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970: 297-313.
12. Eisenberger N, Lieberman M, Williamson KD. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 2003;302:290-292.
13. Morse JM. The hardening of soft data [editorial]. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:591-592.
14. Diamond JM. Soft sciences are often harder than hard sciences. Discover. 1987;8(8):34-39.
15. Cassell J. Perturbing the system: "Hard science," "soft science," and social science: The anxiety and madness of method. Human Organization. 2002;61:177-185.
16. Szent-Gyorgyi A. Looking back. Perspect Biol Med. 1971;15:1-5.
17. Estabrooks C. The conceptual structure of research utilization. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22:203-216.
18. Morse JM. If you believe in theories . . . [editorial]. Qual Health Res. 1992;2:259-261.
19. Meleis AI. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991.
20. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N. Engl J Med. 2003;348: 2082-2090.
21. Hart K, Greenwood H, Truby H. Pound for pound? Comparing the costs incurred by subjects following four commercially available weight loss programmes. J Human Nutr Dietetics. 2003;16:365-368.
22. Baldwin M. Cornered. Universal Press Syndicate. January 13, 2003.
23. Morse JM, Richards L. Readme First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2000.
24. Morse JM. Theoretical congestion [editorial]. Qual Health Res. 2000;10:715-716.
25. Morse JM. Constructing qualitatively derived theory: concept construction and concept typologies. Qual Health Res. In press.
26. Selye H. The Stress of Life. Boston: Butterworths; 1976.
27. Morse JM. Toward a praxis theory of suffering. Adv Nurs Sci. 2000;24:47-59.
28. Morse JM. Constructing qualitatively-derived theory: concept construction and concept typologies. Qual Health Res. In press.
29. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
30. Lakeoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
31. Ortny A. Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
32. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277-299.