Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-63

  Ryan, Katherine E ^a   Ryan, Allison M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944417132     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_4     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Aboud, F. (1988). Children and prejudice. New York: Blackwell.
2. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12, 385-390.
3. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
4. Aronson, J., & Good, C. (2002). The development and consequences of stereotype vulnerability in adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
5. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46.
6. Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 83-103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
9. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
10. Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139-153.
11. Bridgman, B., & Lewis, C. (1996). Gender differences in college mathematics grades and SAT-M scores: A reanalysis of Wainer and Steinberg, Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(3), 257-270.
12. Brophy, J. (1999). RI motivation in education past, present, and future. In Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 11 (pp. 1-44). New York: JAI Press.
13. Cole, N. S., & Zieky, M. J. (2001). The new faces of fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 369-382.
14. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Covington, M., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 169-182.
16. Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students form low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594.
17. Davenport, E. C., Davison, M. L., Kuang, H., Ding, S., Kim, S., & Kwak, N. (1998). High school mathematics course-taking by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 497-514.
18. Deffenbacher, J. (1980). Worry and emotionality in test anxiety. In I. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Doolittle, A. E. (1984, April). Interpretation of differential item performance accompanied by gender differences in academic background. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 247237).
20. Doolittle, A. E. (1985, April), understanding differential item performance as a consequence of gender differences in item performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 263218).
21. Doolittle, A. E., & Cleary, T. A. (1987). Gender-based differential item performance in mathematics achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(2), 157-166.
22. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 40, 1040-1048.
23. Dweck, C. S. (2001). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
25. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283-331). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
26. Eccles, J. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children's interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1991: Vol. 40 (pp. 145-208). Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.
27. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development: Vol. 3 (pp. 1017-1094). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
29. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
30. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Text anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 628-644.
31. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
32. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
33. Feingold, A. (1992a). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy, Review of Educational Research, 62, 61-84.
34. Feingold, A. (1992b). The greater male variability controversy: Science versus politics, Review of Educational Research, 62, 89-90.
35. Graham, S. (1994). Motivation in African-Americans. Review of Educational Research, 64, 55-111.
36. Hall, C. W., Davis, N. B., Bolen, L. M., & Chia, R. (1999). Gender and racial differences in mathematical performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(6), 677-689.
37. Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Harackiewicz, J. M., Pintrich, P. R., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, R. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
39. Harris, A. M., & Carlton, S. T. (1993). Patterns of gender differences on mathematics items on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(2), 137-151.
40. Harter, S. (1990). Self and identity development. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352-387). Cambridge, MT: Harvard University Press.
41. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). ( 1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Inzlict, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Do high-achieving female students underperform in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 796-805.
43. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings.
44. Keating, D. P. (1990). Adolescent thinking. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 54-89). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Kessel, C. & Linn, M. (1996). Grades or scores: Predicting college mathematics performance, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 15(4), 10-14.
46. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
47. Lane, S., Park, C. S., & Stone, C. A. (1998). A framework for evaluating the consequences of assessment programs, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 24-27.
48. Lane, S., Wang, N., & Magone, M. (1996). Gender-related differential item functioning on a middle-school mathematics performance assessment, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(4), 21-27.
49. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092-1107.
50. Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-27.
51. Linn, R. L., & Harnisch, D. (1984). Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 108-118.
52. Loveless, P. (2000). Does self-stereotyping affect performance on the ACT assessment? (ACT Research Tech Report No 2000-6 [5020000E]). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
53. Maehr, M. L. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation: Vol. 1 (pp. 39-73). New York; Academic Press.
54. Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371-409.
55. Meece, J. L., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 60-70.
56. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
57. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons, responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
58. Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of the lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
59. Morris, L., Davis, M., & Hutchings, C. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised Worry-Emotionality Scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541-555.
60. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A., Gonzales, D. L., Kelly, T. A., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Boston, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
61. National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Digest for educational statistics, 2001. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
62. National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Digest for educational statistics, 2003. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
63. Nettles, M. T. (2000, October 27). The status and consequences of admissions test performance for the nation 's demographically diverse population of aspiring students. Paper presented at the Fulbright's Educational Experts Seminar, Ann Arbor, MI.
64. Nicholls, J. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Nicholls, J. (1990). What is ability and why are we mindful of it? A developmental perspective. In R. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 11-40). New Haven: Yale University Press.
66. No, Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107th Cong., 110 Cong. Rec. 1425.115 Stat. (2002).
67. Noddings, N. (1992). Variability: A pernicious hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 62, 85-88.
68. O'Neill, K. A., & McPeek, W. M. (1993). Item and test characteristics that are associated with differential item functioning. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 255-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
69. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
70. Phinney, J. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 448-514.
71. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
73. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
74. Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematics problem-solving. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 55-71.
75. Ruble, D., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 3, 933-1016.
76. Ryan, K. E., (1991).The performance of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure across samples and matching criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 325-337.
77. Ryan, K. E., & Chui, S. (2001). An examination of item context effects, DIF, and gender DIF. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(1), 73-90.
78. Ryan, K. E., & Fan, M. (1996). Examining gender DIF on a multiple-choice test of mathematics: A confirmatory approach. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(4), 21-27.
79. Sarason, I. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research: Vol. 2 (pp. 383-403). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
80. Scheuneman, J. A., & Grima, A. (1997). Characteristics of quantitative work items associated with differential performance for female and black examinees. Applied Measurement in Evaluation, 10(4), 299-320.
81. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201.
82. Schmidt, W. (2003). Too little too late: American high schools in an international context. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brooking papers on education policy (pp. 253-308). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
83. Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2001 ) The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
84. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, T. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
85. Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
86. Snow, R. E. (1993). Construct validity and constructed-response tests. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 45-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
87. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
88. Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., & Lushene, R. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
89. Stanley, J. C. (1991, November). Differences on the College Board achievement tests and the Advanced Placement Examinations: Effect sizes versus some upper-tail ratios. Paper presented at the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Iowa City: University of Iowa, the Connie Belin National Center for Gifted Education.
90. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
91. Steele, C. M., & Aronson J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
92. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
93. Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 10 (pp. 99-142). Greenwich: JAI Press.
94. Wainer, H., & Steinberg, L.S. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323-326.
95. Walsh, M., Hickey, C., & Duffy, J. (1999). Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. Sex Roles, 41(1/4), 219-240.
96. Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 616-622.
97. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
98. Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
99. Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 92-104.