Energy dissipation of compression members in concentrically braced frames: Review of experimental data

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 552-559

  Lee, Kangmin ^a   Bruneau, Michel ^b  

^a Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bracing; Building frames; Compression; Energy dissipation; Seismic response; Slenderness ratio

Indexed keywords

BRACING; BUILDING FRAMES; SEISMIC RESPONSES; SLENDERNESS RATIO;

BUILDINGS; COMPACTION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DEGRADATION; EARTHQUAKES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; HYSTERESIS; LOADING; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SEISMOLOGY; STRAIN; STRUCTURAL MEMBERS;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

EID: 15944399101     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(552)     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. American Institute of Steel Constructions (AISC). (1992). "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings." Chicago.
2. Archambault, M. -H., Tremblay, R., and Filiatrault, A. (1995). "Étude du comportment séismique des contreventements ductiles en x avec profilés tubulaires en acier." Rep. No. EPM/GCS-1995-09, Dept. de Génie Civil Section Structures, École Polytechnique, Montréal (in French).
3. Astaneh-Asl, A., Goel, S. C., and Hanson, R. D. (1982). "Cycle behavior of double angle bracing members with end gusset plates." Rep. No. UMEE 82R7, August, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
4. Black, R. G., Wenger, W. A., and Popov, E. P. (1980). "Inelastic buckling of steel struts under cyclic load and reversal." Rep. No. UCB/EERC-80/40, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
5. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., and Whittaker, A. (1998). Ductile design of steel structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Canadian Standard Association (CSA). (1994), "Limit State Design of Structures," CAN/CSA-S16.1-M94, Rexdale, Ont., Canada.
7. Jain, A. K., Goel, S. C., and Hanson, R. D. (1978). "Hysteresis behavior of bracing members and seismic response of braced frames with different proportions." Rep. No. UMEE 78R3, July, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
8. Lee, K., and Bruneau, M. (2002). "Review of energy dissipation of compression members in concentrically braced frame." Rep. No. MCEER-02-0005, October, Multidiscipline Center for Earthquake Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
9. Leowardi, L. S., and Walpole, W. R. (1996). "Performance of steel brace members." Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
10. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1978). "Tentative lateral force requirement." Seismology Committee, Sacramento/ San Francisco/Los Angeles, Calif.
11. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1990). "Tentative lateral force requirements." Seismology Committee, Sacramento/ San Francisco/Los Angeles, Calif.
12. Tremblay, R., and Lacerte, M. (2002). "Influence of the properties of bracing members on the seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames." Proc., 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics, London.
13. Walpole, W. R. (1996). "Behaviour of cold-formed steel RHS members under cyclic loading." Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
14. Zayas, V. A., Popop, E. P., and Mahin, S. A. (1980). "Cyclic inelastic buckling of tubular steel braces." Rep. No. UCB/EERC-80/16, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.