Algorithms for structural comparison and statistical analysis of 3D protein motifs

Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2005, PSB 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 334-345

  Chen, Brian Y ^a   Fofanov, Viacheslav Y ^b   Kristensen, David M ^c   Kimmel, Marek ^b   Lichtarge, Olivier ^c,d   Kavraki, Lydia E ^a,c  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rice University   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Department of Molecular and Human Genetics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; CHEMICAL SIMILARITY; EVOLUTIONARY TRACES; FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS; FUNCTIONAL SITES; HIERARCHICAL STRATEGIES; NONPARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATION; PARTIAL MATCHES; PROTEIN MOTIFS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRUCTURAL COMPARISON; STRUCTURAL MOTIFS; SUBSITES; TARGET PROTEINS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 15944389002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Jones S. et. al. Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8(1):3-7, 2004.
2. Altschul S.F, et. al. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids. Res., 25(17):3389-3402, Sept 1997.
3. Wu T.D, Nevill-Manning C.G, and Brutlag D.L. Fast probabilistic analysis of sequence function using scoring matrices. Bioinf., 16(3):233-44, 2000.
4. Hulo N. et. al. Recent improvements to the PROSITE database. Nucl. Acids. Res., 32:0134-0137, 2004.
5. Blundell T.L., Jhoti H., and Abell C. High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design. Nat Rev. Drug Disc. 1:45-54, 2002.
6. Barker J.A. and Thornton J.M. An algorithm for constraint-based structural template matching. Bioinf., 19(13):1644-1649, 2003.
7. Stark A., Sunyaev S., and Russell R.B. A model for statistical significance of local similarities in structure. J. Mol. Biol., 326:1307-1316, 2003.
8. Laing M.R et.al. Webfeature: an interactive web tool for identifying and visualizing functional sites on macromolecular structures. Nucl. Acids Res., 31(13):3324-7, 2003.
9. Wolfson H.J. and Rigoutsos I. Geometric hashing: An overview. IEEE Comp. Sci. Eng., 4(4): 10-21, Oct 1997.
10. Lichtarge O. and Sowa M.E. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curt. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12(1):21-27, 2002.
11. Mihalek et. al. A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. J. Mol. Biol., 336:1265-82, 2004.
12. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., and Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol., 257(2): 342-358, 1996.
13. Yao H. et. al. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol., 326:255-261, 2003.
14. Taylor W, Orengo A. Protein structure alignment. J.Mol.Biol., 208:1-22, 1989.
15. Holm L. and Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 233:123-138, 1990.
16. Artymuik P.J. et. al. A graph-theoretic approach to the identification of 3D patterns of amino acid side chains. J.Mol.Biol., 243:327-44, 1994.
17. Bachar O. et. al. A computer vision based technique for 3D sequence independent structural comparison of proteins. Prot. Eng., 6(3):279-288, 1993.
18. Verbitsky G., Nussinov R., and Wolfson H. Structural comparison allowing hinge bending. Prot: Struct. Funct. Genet., 34(2):232-254, 1999.
19. Liebowitz N et al Automated multiple structure alignment and detection of a common substructural motif. Prot: Struct. Pane. Genet., 43:235-245, 2001.
20. Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., and Thornton J.M. Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Prot.Sci, 5:1001-13, 1996.
21. Akutsu T. On determining the congruity of point sets in higher dimensions. In Proc. ISAAC: 5th Symp. Alg. Comp., 1994.
22. Sowa M.E. et. al. Prediction and confirmation of a site critical for effector regulation of RGS domain activity. Nat. Struct. Biol., 8:234-237, 2001.
23. H.M. Berman et al. The protein data bank. Nucl.Acids Res, 28:235-42, 2000.
24. Rosen M. et. al. Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity. Prot. Eng., 11 (4):263-277, 1998.
25. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall: London, 1986.
26. Jones M.C., Marron J.S., and Sheather S.J. A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 91:401-407, Mar 1996.
27. Sheather S.J. and Jones M.C. A reliable data-based bandwidth selections method for kernel density estimation. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 53(3):683-690, 1991.
28. Birnbaum Z.W. and Tingey F.H. One-sided confidence contours for probability distribution functions. Ann. Math. Stat., 22(4):592-596, Dec 2003.