The SIIR index - A non-linear combination of waveform size and irregularity parameters for classification of motor unit potentials

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 957-964

  Zalewska, Ewa ^a   Hausmanowa Petrusewicz, Irena ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^b MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Irregularity coefficient; Motor unit action potential; Size index

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WAVEFORM;

EID: 15944388300     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. F. Buchthal, and Z. Kamieniecka The diagnostic yield of quantified electromyography and quantified muscle biopsy in neuromuscular disorders Muscle Nerve 5 1982 265 280
2. F. Buchthal, and P. Pinelli Analysis of muscle action potentials as a diagnostic aid in neuromuscular disorders Acta Med Scand 266 Suppl 142 1952 315 327
3. B. Cengiz, F. Ozdag, U.H. Ulas, Z. Odabasi, and O. Vural Discriminant analysis of various concentric needle EMG and macro-EMG parameters in detecting myopathic abnormality Clin Neurophysiol 113 2002 1423 1428
4. A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A. Scheel, and F. Buchthal Diagnostic yield of analysis of the patttern of electrical activity and of individual motor unit potentials in neurogenic involvement J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40 1977 544 554
5. S.D. Nandedkar, and D.B. Sanders Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials Muscle Nerve 12 1989 288 293
6. G. Pfeiffer, and K. Kunze Turn and phase counts of individual motor unit potentials: correlation and reliability Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85 1989 161 165
7. G. Pfeiffer, and K. Kunze Discriminant classification of motor unit potentials (MUPs) successfully separates neurogenic and myopathic conditions. A comparison of multi- and univariate diagnostical algorithms for MUP analysis Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 97 1995 191 207
8. M. Sonoo, and E. Stålberg The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: analysis of the MUP thickness and the proposal of size index Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89 1993 291 303
9. E. Stålberg, S. Andreassen, B. Falck, H. Lang, A. Rosenfalck, and W. Trojaborg Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials: a proposition for standardized terminology and criteria for measurement J Clin Neurophysiol 3 4 1986 313 348
10. C.R. Stewart, S.D. Nandedkar, J.M. Massey, J.M. Gilchrist, P.E. Barkhaus, and D.B. Sanders Evaluation of an automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action potentials Muscle Nerve 12 2 1989 141 148
11. A. Uncini, D.J. Lange, R.E. Lovelace, M. Solomon, and A.P. Hays Long-duration polyphasic motor unit potentials in myopathies: a quantitative study with pathological correlation Muscle Nerve 13 3 1990 263 267
12. E. Zalewska, and I. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz Evaluation of MUP shape irregularity - a new concept of quantification IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42 1995 616 620
13. E. Zalewska, and I. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz Global and detailed features of motor unit potentials J Med Eng Phys 21 1999 421 429
14. E. Zalewska, and I. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz Effectiveness of motor unit potentials classification using various parameters and indexes Clin Neurophysiol 111 2000 1380 1387