Treatment of angina pectoris: Associations with symptom severity

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 299-306

  Kirwan, B A ^a   Lubsen, J ^a,b   Poole Wilson, P A ^c  

^a SOCAR RESEARCH SA   (Switzerland)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL HEART AND LUNG INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anginal attack frequency; Ischaemic heart disease; Stable angina pectoris; Treatment of anginal attacks

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT; NIFEDIPINE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 15944388236     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.050     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Chaitman B.R., Bourassa M.G., Davis K., et al. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. 64:1981;360-367
2. Eagle K.A., Guyton R.A., Davidoff R., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Circulation. 100:1999;1464-1480
3. RITA-2 trial participants Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. Lancet. 350:1997;461-468
4. Lubsen J., Poole-Wilson P.A., Pocock S.J., van Dalen F.J., Baumann J., Kirwan B.-A., et al. Design and current status of ACTION: a coronary disease trial investigating outcome with nifedipine GITS. Eur. Heart J. 19(Suppl. 1):1998;120-132
5. Rehnqvist N., Hjemdahl P., Billing E., et al. Effects of metoprolol vs. verapamil in patients with stable angina pectoris: the angina prognosis study in Stockholm (APSIS). Eur. Heart J. 17:1996;76-81
6. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis. 9th ed.:1994;Little Brown, Boston
7. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research. 1991;319 Chapman & Hall, London
8. Rose G. The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys. Bull. World Health Organ. 27:1962;645-659
9. Lawlor D.A., Adamson J., Ebrahim S. Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: are all of the questions necessary? J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 57:2003;538-541
10. Krogh V., Trevisan M., Panico S., et al. Prevalence and correlates of angina pectoris in the Italian nine communities study. Research group ATS-RF2 of the Italian National Research Council. Epidemiology. 2:1991;26-32