Teaching and the teacher labour market: The case for reform

Australian Economic Review

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 91-98

  Webster, Elizabeth ^a   Wooden, Mark ^a   Marks, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEACHING;

EID: 15944383439     PISSN: 00049018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2005.00356.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Auditor General Victoria 2001, Teacher Work Force Planning, Victorian Auditor-General's Office, Melbourne.
2. Bempah, E. 1994, 'An empirical analysis of teacher mobility', Economics of Education Review, vol. 13, pp. 69-77.
3. Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P. and Propper, C. 2001, 'The intricacies of the relationship between pay and performance for teachers: Do teachers respond to performance related pay schemes?', Working Paper Series no. 01/35, CMPO, University of Bristol.
4. Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education 2003, Australia's Teachers: Australia's Future - Advancing Innovation, Science Technology and Mathematics, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
5. Deere, D. and Strayer, W. 2001, 'Improving TAAS scores result of better accountability for Texas schools', Office of University Relations, Texas A&M University.
6. Department of Employment, Education and Training (various), 'Forecasting teacher demand by subject', mimeo, Denis Mueller and Associates, Melbourne.
7. Department of Employment and Industrial Relations, Occupational Analysis Branch 1982, Employment Prospects by Industry and Occupation, A Labour Market Analysis, AGPS, Canberra.
8. Department of Employment and Youth Affairs, Manpower Programmes Section 1979, Employment Prospects by Industry and Occupation, A Labour Market Analysis, AGPS, Canberra
9. Dolton, P. 1990, 'The economics of UK teacher supply: The graduate's decision', Economic Journal, vol. 100, pp. 91-104.
10. Dolton, P. and Makepeace, G. H. 1993, 'Female labour force participation and the choice of occupation: The supply of teachers', European Economic Review, vol. 37, pp. 1393-411.
11. Dolton, P. and Mavromaras, K. G. 1994, 'Intergenerational occupational choice comparisons: The case of teachers in the UK', Economic Journal vol. 104, pp. 841-63.
12. Dolton, P. and van der Klaauw, W. 1995, 'Leaving teaching in the UK: A duration analysis', Economic Journal, vol. 105, pp. 431-44.
13. Dolton, P. and van der Klaauw, W. 1999, 'The turnover of teachers: A competing risks explanation', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 81, pp. 543-50.
14. Dolton, P., Tremayne, A. and Chung, T.-P. 2003, 'The economic cycle and teacher supply', in Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
15. Figlio, D. N. 2002, 'Can public schools buy better qualified teachers?', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 55, pp. 686-99.
16. Frijters, P., Shields, M. A. and Wheatley-Price, S. 2004, 'To teach of not to teach? Panel data evidence on the quitting decision', Discussion Paper no. 1164, IZA, Bonn.
17. Goldharber, D. and Lui, A. 2003, 'Occupational choices and the academic proficiency of the teacher workforce, in Developments in School Finance 2000-01, ed. W. Fowler, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
18. Gritz, R. M. and Theobald, N. D. 1996, 'The effects of school district spending priorities on length of stay in teaching', Journal of Human Resources, vol. 31, pp. 477-512.
19. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F. and Rivkin, S. G. 1999, 'Do higher salaries buy better teachers?', Working Paper 7082, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
20. Henke, R. R., Chen, X. and Geis, S. 2000, Progress through the Teacher Pipeline: 1992-93 College Graduates and Elementary/Secondary School Teaching as of 1997, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
21. Jacob, B. A. 2002, 'Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools', Working Paper 8968, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
22. Jacob, B. A. and Lefgren, L. 2002, 'The impact of teacher training on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago', Working Paper 8916, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
23. Jacob, B. A. and Levitt, S. D. 2002, 'Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating', Working Paper 9413, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
24. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F. and Stecher, B. M. 2000, 'What do test scores in Texas tell us?', Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 8, no. 49.
25. Ladd, H. F. 1999, 'The Dallas school accountability and inventive program: An evaluation of its impact on student outcomes', Economics and Education Review, vol. 18, pp. 1-16.
26. Manski, C. F. 1987, 'Academic ability, earnings and the decision to become a teacher: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972', in Public Sector Payrolls, ed. D. Wise, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Milanowski, A. 2003, 'An exploration of the pay levels needed to attract students with mathematics, science and technology skills to a career in K-12 teaching', Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 11, no. 50.
28. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs 2003, Demand and Supply of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Australia, AGPS, Canberra.
29. Murnane, R. J. and Olsen, R. J. 1989, 'The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on duration in teaching: Evidence from Michigan', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, pp. 347-52.
30. Murnane, R. J. and Olsen, R. J. 1990, 'The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: Evidence from North Carolina', Journal of Human Resources, vol. 25, pp. 106-24.
31. Murnane, R. J., Singer, J., Willett, J., Kemple, J. and Olsen, R. 1991, Who Will Teach? Policies that Matter, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
32. Preston, B. 2000, Teacher Supply and Demand to 2005: Projections and Context, Australian Council of Deans of Education, Canberra.
33. Schlecty, P. and Vance, V. 1981, 'Do academically able teachers leave education? The North Carolina case', Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 63, pp. 105-12.
34. Stinebrickner, T. 2001, 'A dynamic model of teacher labor supply', Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 19, pp. 197-230.
35. Tusin, L. F. 1999, 'Deciding to teach', in The Role of Self in Teacher Development, eds R. P. Lipka and T. M. Brinthaupt, State University of New York Press, Albany.
36. Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2004, 'The HILDA Survey four years on', Australian Economic Review, vol. 37, pp. 343-9.
37. Weaver, T. 1983, America's Teacher Quality Problem: Alternatives for Reform, Praeger Publishers, New York.
38. Webster, E., Wooden, M. and Marks, G. 2004, 'Reforming the labour market for Australian teachers', Working Paper no. 28/04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
39. Young, B. J. 1995, 'Career plans and work perceptions of pre-service teachers', Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 11, pp. 281-92.
40. Zabalza, A., Turnbull, P. and Williams, G. 1979, The Economics of Teacher Supply, Cambridge University Press, Cambrdge.